Monday, May 21, 2012
Monday, May 14, 2012
First Legitimate Obama Document Discovered
Monday, 14 May 2012 08:17
'A Kenya friend of the alleged BLACK father of Obama claimed he spelled his name with the double r. Now a document from the British Colony of Kenya in the UK lists circa 1960 Kenya students attending foreign universities one of them being Barrack H. Obama spelled with the double r. This is the GOLD STANDARD of Obama documents.
That means all of the Barack with a single r documents are bogus and those documents and Obama's claim that he has a BLACK FATHER go out the window. Also clean your hard drive of the bogus early Obama family photos doing the impossible removing the Dumbo ears and the Asian eyes from Asian Obama.'
JPMorgan's Trading Debacle
Monday, 14 May 2012 08:33
'For years, JPMorgan Chase (JPM), perhaps the riskiest bank in the world, got a pass. Sure there were minor hiccups along the way. But basically investors had the attitude with the bank run by Jamie Dimon that they were going to be hands off. Sub-prime mortgage loans: You've proved you can handle them. Foreclosure problems: We're sure you've got your best people on it. A derivative portfolio roughly the size of the GDP of India: We trust that you have covered your bets.
In fact, despite its huge size and complexity and risk, investors have allowed Dimon and JPMorgan to skate by on one of the smallest capital cushions, which is how much equity you have to protect against losses, on Wall Street. When you sort JPMorgan's loans and investments by riskiness, a dubious calculation, but used by Wall Street nonetheless, the bank holds an equivalent of just 10% of that as capital. That compares to 13% at Citigroup (C) and 15% at Goldman Sachs (GS).'
Zionist Hague
Monday, 14 May 2012 05:24
'British Foreign Secretary William Hague has called upon British people to stop complaining and work harder because hard work is the only way out of the country’s financial woes.
In an interview with The Sunday Telegraph, Hague said, “There's only one growth strategy: work hard.”
Hague also called on the country’s bosses to “get on the plane, go and sell things overseas, go and study overseas.” “I think they should be getting on with the task of creating more of those jobs and more of those exports, rather than complaining about it,” he said.'
Thursday, May 3, 2012
Obama Signs Executive Order Declaring International Law for the United States
Obama Signs Executive Order Declaring International Law for the United States
On May 1, 2012, our Glorious Leader, Premier Barack Obama AKA Barry Soetoro AKA Barry the Rat, signed yet another Executive Order –Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation. This dictate is designed to standardize regulations between the United States and it’s so called trading partners.
What is a regulation? A law. So what is actually being attempted here is a standardization of international law. It is anabsolute violation of the Constitution for the United States to legislate our law outside of our borders.
Considering the many international securityagreements the traitors occupying our highest seats of power have entered into, this latest executive order can absolutely be used to institute gun confiscation laws/regulations, without any consent by our Congress or our Judicial. And once these foreign laws are brought to the United States under the various securityagreements, foreign troops will be brought in to enforce the foreign laws upon the people of the United States.
Considering the many international securityagreements the traitors occupying our highest seats of power have entered into, this latest executive order can absolutely be used to institute gun confiscation laws/regulations, without any consent by our Congress or our Judicial. And once these foreign laws are brought to the United States under the various securityagreements, foreign troops will be brought in to enforce the foreign laws upon the people of the United States.
So look at what we have now.
- The Patriot Act which allows unlimited spying on the American people by the government.
- The National Defense Authorization Act with Sections 1021 and 1022 for the military arrests and indefinite detention of American nationals without any due process of the law.
- HR 347 Trespass Law for the implementation of Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act upon any citizen who dares to speak out against the insurgency.
- Executive Order National Defense Resources Preparedness Act, which allows the dictator to confiscate every resource of the United States, including we the people as conscripts to be put in servitude to the insurgency.
This is exactly what the Bolsheviks did to the Russian people in 1917. Now we have this new executive order for the implementation of laws not legislated by our Congress. If we were to allow ourselves to be disarmed by these international soviet socialists, the next step would be to eliminate everyone who refuses to acquiesce to collective slavery.
This latest executive order is nothing more than another act of blatant treason and we the American people must reject it absolutely.
Here is the Executive Order. Read and interpret it for yourself.
EXECUTIVE ORDER
- – - – - – -
PROMOTING INTERNATIONAL REGULATORY COOPERATION
- – - – - – -
PROMOTING INTERNATIONAL REGULATORY COOPERATION
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to promote international regulatory cooperation, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Policy. Executive Order 13563 of January 18, 2011 (ImprovingRegulation and Regulatory Review), states that our regulatory system must protect public health, welfare, safety, and our environment while promoting economic growth, innovation, competitiveness, and job creation. In an increasingly global economy, international regulatory cooperation, consistent with domestic law and prerogatives and U.S. trade policy, can be an important means of promoting the goals of Executive Order 13563.
The regulatory approaches taken by foreign governments may differ from those taken by U.S. regulatory agencies to address similar issues. In some cases, the differences between the regulatory approaches of U.S. agencies and those of their foreign counterparts might not be necessary and might impair the ability of American businesses to export and compete internationally. In meeting shared challenges involving health, safety, labor, security, environmental, and other issues, international regulatory cooperation can identify approaches that are at least as protective as those that are or would be adopted in the absence of such cooperation. International regulatory cooperation can also reduce, eliminate, or prevent unnecessary differences in regulatory requirements.
Sec. 2. Coordination of International Regulatory Cooperation. (a) The Regulatory Working Group (Working Group) established by Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 1993 (Regulatory Planning and Review), which was reaffirmed by Executive Order 13563, shall, as appropriate:
(i) serve as a forum to discuss, coordinate, and develop a common understanding among agencies of U.S. Government positions and priorities with respect to:
(A) international regulatory cooperation activities that are reasonably anticipated to lead to significant regulatory actions;
(B) efforts across the Federal Government to support significant, cross-cutting international regulatory cooperation activities, such as the work of regulatory cooperation councils; and
(i) serve as a forum to discuss, coordinate, and develop a common understanding among agencies of U.S. Government positions and priorities with respect to:
(A) international regulatory cooperation activities that are reasonably anticipated to lead to significant regulatory actions;
(B) efforts across the Federal Government to support significant, cross-cutting international regulatory cooperation activities, such as the work of regulatory cooperation councils; and
(C) the promotion of good regulatory practices internationally, as well as the promotion of U.S. regulatory approaches, as appropriate; and
(ii) examine, among other things:
(A) appropriate strategies for engaging in the development of regulatory approaches through international regulatory cooperation, particularly in emerging technology areas, when consistent with section 1 of this order;
(B) best practices for international regulatory cooperation with respect to regulatory development, and, where appropriate, information exchange and other regulatory tools; and
(C) factors that agencies should take into account when determining whether and how to consider other regulatory approaches under section 3(d) of this order.
(b) As Chair of the Working Group, the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) shall convene the Working Group as necessary to discuss international regulatory cooperation issues as described above, and the Working Group shall include a representative from the Office of the United States Trade Representative and, as appropriate, representatives from other agencies and offices.
(c) The activities of the Working Group, consistent with law, shall not duplicate the efforts of existing interagency bodies and coordination mechanisms. The WorkingGroup shall consult with existing interagency bodies when appropriate.
(d) To inform its discussions, and pursuant to section 4 of Executive Order 12866, the Working Group may commission analytical reports and studies by OIRA, the Administrative Conference of the United States, or any other relevant agency, and the Administrator of OIRA may solicit input, from time to time, from representatives of business, nongovernmental organizations, and the public.
(e) The Working Group shall develop and issue guidelines on the applicability and implementation of sections 2 through 4 of this order.
(f) For purposes of this order, the Working Group shall operate by consensus.
Sec. 3. Responsibilities of Federal Agencies. To the extent permitted by law, and consistent with the principles and requirements of Executive Order 13563 and Executive Order 12866, each agency shall:
(a) if required to submit a Regulatory Plan pursuant to Executive Order 12866, include in that plan a summary of its international regulatory cooperation activities that are reasonably anticipated to lead to significant regulations, with an explanation of how these activities advance the purposes of Executive Order 13563 and this order;
(b) ensure that significant regulations that the agency identifies as having significant international impacts are designated as such in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions, on RegInfo.gov, and onRegulations.gov;
(c) in selecting which regulations to include in its retrospective review plan, as required by Executive Order 13563, consider:
(i) reforms to existing significant regulations that address unnecessary differences in regulatory requirements between the United States and its major trading partners, consistent with section 1 of this order, when stakeholders provide adequate information to the agency establishing that the differences are unnecessary; and
(ii) such reforms in other circumstances as the agency deems appropriate; and
(d) for significant regulations that the agency identifies as having significant international impacts, consider, to the extent feasible, appropriate, and consistent with law, any regulatory approaches by a foreign government that the United States has agreed to consider under a regulatory cooperation council work plan.
Sec. 4. Definitions. For purposes of this order:
(a) “Agency” means any authority of the United States that is an “agency” under 44 U.S.C. 3502(1), other than those considered to be independent regulatory agencies, as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5).
(b) “International impact” is a direct effect that a proposed or final regulation is expected to have on international trade and investment, or that otherwise may be of significant interest to the trading partners of the United States.
(c) “International regulatory cooperation” refers to a bilateral, regional, or multilateral process, other than processes that are covered by section 6(a)(ii), (iii), and (v) of this order, in which national governments engage in various forms of collaboration and communication with respect to regulations, in particular a process that is reasonably anticipated to lead to the development of significant regulations.
(d) “Regulation” shall have the same meaning as “regulation” or “rule” in section 3(d) of Executive Order 12866.
(e) “Significant regulation” is a proposed or final regulation that constitutes a significant regulatory action.
(f) “Significant regulatory action” shall have the same meaning as in section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
Sec. 5. Independent Agencies. Independent regulatory agencies are encouraged to comply with the provisions of this order.
Sec. 6. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to a department or agency, or the head thereof;
(ii) the coordination and development of international trade policy and negotiations pursuant to section 411 of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C. 2451) and section 141 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2171);
(iii) international trade activities undertaken pursuant to section 3 of the Act of February 14, 1903 (15 U.S.C. 1512), subtitle C of the Export Enhancement Act of 1988, as amended (15 U.S.C. 4721 et seq.), and Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1979 (19 U.S.C. 2171 note);
(iv) the authorization process for the negotiation and conclusion of international agreements pursuant to 1 U.S.C. 112b(c) and its implementing regulations (22 C.F.R. 181.4) and implementing procedures (11 FAM 720);
(v) activities in connection with subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 31 of the United States Code, title 26 of the United States Code, or Public Law 111-203 and other laws relating to financial regulation; or
(vi) the functions of the Director of OMB relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
BARACK OBAMA
Shadow Government
The Shadow Government
There has been a secret at the heart of the government of this nation since 1871. It’s called the “Act of 1871” and that “ACT” is what created the District of Columbia. (1)
It applies ONLY to a ten square mile area inside Washington D.C. However ever since the New Millennium began this government has been trying to enforce every law that they have passed for themselves (for that ten-square mile area of Washington DC) onto the rest of us.
Until now this ‘government’ created by the Act of 1871, has ruled over the rest of us as our very own ‘SHADOW GOVERNMENT’ and when the public demanded to know what was going on after 911: Instead of giving us the answers we deserved the feds gave us The Department of Homeland Security to “Dominate, Intimidate & Control” the public in the post-911 era. (2)
Until now this ‘Shadow Government’ has been quietly operating in the shadows always behind closed doors where literally everything they do is secret. But since the first day of this year when Obama signed the Indefinite Detention Act (in SECRET) the Shadow government has been looking for a particular event to finally “go-public” and declare their TREASON for the whole world to see and run from.
That moment will come when ZATO holds its next meeting inside the City of Chicago in about three weeks. Chicago is America’s third largest city with approximately 2.7 million people. It is at the apex of both rail and air traffic in this country and it is rich and influential far beyond its actual size among the cities in this country. Here’s some of what is being safeguarded inside that city. (3)
The problem for Chicago and for the rest of us is that the feds have unofficially announced that for the next three weeks heavily armed American troops will begin occupying Chicago in preparation for ‘an event’ which the government says could be very dangerous—so dangerous in fact that the citizens of Chicago may have to be evacuated from their city; during the coming NATO Summit. (4)
However there are several strategic and military problems with this scenario. First it will take a considerable amount of time to evacuate a city of that size no matter how that might be attempted. The faceless government says that they will wait until ‘they have determined’ that a genuine threat is present. While all the various government agencies will have three weeks to “get ready” for this “event” – that still will not allow for anything like the actual evacuation of the City of Chicago.
And besides all that, no one has offered the citizens a choice of whether they want to stay or go. Many will decide to fight this forced evacuation and that won’t be pretty or useful.
As far as the public goes there is another problem. First no one has claimed “RESPONSIBILITY” for giving this order: Not the president who has been in hiding since January one, not the congress which has washed their hands to everything important to the public, not the Supreme Court which has gone into hiding and especially not the DHS, the Secret Service, the cowardly FBI, the CIA or any of the other alphabet soup which tends to secretly control our lives. Because if anyone signs this hypothetical ORDER, then the public will absolutely know WHO to blame for this little piece of TREASON, not just against Chicago but against the whole country. Because in this case:
“As Chicago Goes, so goes the Nation”!
Strategically there are also a great many problems. FEMA Camps have been prepared all across the country, for just such an event—but none of them are close enough to Chicago, to hold anything like two and three-quarters of a million people, at a moments notice. Also the Shadow government has not made clear why it should be necessary to evacuate the entire city. If they know something now that the public does not know; would it not be easier to just move the summit and leave Chicago intact? This borders on insanity! If they do NOT know anything in real terms, then why the need to create this bellicose and belligerent attitude that flies directly in the face of everything this place was supposed to stand for?
Militarily it seems to be ‘very important’ to the Shadow Government that the public recognize the government’s need to respond with the full military force of the entire nation against whatever it is they are not yet telling us might be about to strike the City of Chicago.
If the point here is the same as the motto of TSA “to Dominate, Intimidate and Control the Public” then there will be a lot more than just some trouble enforcing their semi-bogus-ultimatums. The first problem is that the US does not have that much power available nationwide to do this thing—especially if when the Shadow Government moves to evacuate Chicago—objections and riots might well break out everywhere else in sympathy with Chicago. And since the government cannot fight this fight in every major city simultaneously: this egregious action might just be premature: IF this strong-arm tactic is premature, then a civil war could easily break out. And because the Shadow-Government is not prepared to take on the entire nation, that uprising might just end this farce once and for all.
In trying to look at this with clear eyes; it becomes very difficult to see why this entire episode was even begun. ZATO could have their pomp & ceremony in private in any number of other places; it does NOT have to be in Chicago—so why is this continuing, if there is no need to endanger 2.7 million people? Especially if this fake-government doesn’t even know what it could be up against! Where are the leaders on this one? So far the only one who will take any responsibility is the Sheriff of Chicago, and this is way above his pay-grade. If this is about a dirty-bomb or something bigger, then why would any government let the target remain undefended—when all they would need to do is move the damned meeting-place?
“In 1968 Mayor Daley’s thugs beat the shit out of national reporters on the streets and inside the convention hall. That all took place on camera in 1968, and was broadcast live: But there were no recriminations against the “authorities” that were massively out-of-control – which gave rise to the actual POLICE-STATE that we are living in now.
As I suggested yesterday, if the people living in Chicago just leave town or stay in their homes for the entire three days of rage; then all that firepower will have no one but the professional trouble-makers to murder.)
However if those working the convention could also be persuaded to just stay home, then this convention would simply collapse as none of them has ever done before.
If the bartenders, the waitress, the cooks and chefs, the hookers and the parking attendants were all to just fail to show up: the Convention would become an instant failure. I know that the almighty buck is a huge temptation but how many will actually want to work for the extra bucks if they know that they will all be targeted by Amerika’s most aggressive “protective-forces” that will include armed drones, militarized police and probably bulletproof checkpoint stations along with heavily armored fencing? Is your life really that cheap that you would be willing to die to serve the world’s scummiest people for just a few hours of your irreplaceable time? Why don’t we set the agenda this time by:
“WITHHOLDING our SERVICES.”
Think about it people! Because we KNOW that traditional demonstrations have always FAILED and have only managed to get us arrested, brutalized or killed – and we have NEVER succeeded whenever we have used that approach: So why not try something else this time? This government as George Carlin said “does not give a FCK about you or me, they don’t care about you, they don’t give a fck about you,” and they never have!
SO WHY DON’T WE JUST STOP SERVING THEM!” (5)
But there’s one other thing at issue now. The various Wards inside the City of Chicago might very much resent the Marines coming in to kick out those that have been paying for their own protection all these years. Who will be evacuated first? Will it be the street people or the filthy rich, and what about the Zionists? Chicago has more than its share of those vermin too. Then there are the turf wars inside that city between not just the WARD bosses, but the gangs, not to mention the black & white problems of the inner-city that will all become heavily involved with this government’s rape and plunder of a major city. This will cost someone TRILLIONS per day to shut down the City of Chicago—who will PAY that bill?
It can’t be NATO, because that is still the US taxpayers, and it won’t be the feral government because they’re dead broke so no one will be in line to either call for the evacuations or pay for all that will obviously be lost after 72 hours of lawlessness in the third largest city in America!
This became a problem when this place allowed itself to have two governments—the one we claim to have and the one established by the Act of 1871, that was reinforced when in 1913 we gave away the power to print our money to a privately-owned criminal cabal, that is foreign in nature and has controlled our financial system since 1913—outright!
Whoever ordered this massive crime against the people of Chicago needs to be arrested BEFORE this so-called Conference can be held. And unlike what traditionally happens inside the CRIMINAL Just-us System; this needs to be acted on immediately—not in two or three or five years time but a decision on this must be reached almost immediately—if the real and long-term threat to this nation is be averted.
1) United States Corporation – 5 min video
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
