LISTENING-IN TO OUR PHONE CALLS GIVES THE GAME AWAY
If we go back to square one and start asking basic questions about our experiences with these exposures, interesting answers emerge. The first question that arises is this:
•Why is it that so many intelligence eavesdroppers listen to every domestic and especially international telephone call that we make and receive?
After all, the Editor has not stolen any money, has not murdered anyone, has not abducted anyone else’s child, is not a Nazi war criminal, is not engaged in espionage, is not an agent of a foreign power, has not defrauded anyone, and is not engaged in criminal activity in any shape or form. And neither, for instance, is Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., let alone Mr A. Clifton Hodges, the Attorney for the CMKM/CMKX victims, whom the Editor speaks to quite frequently on the transatlantic line.
Is it that these eager eavesdroppers like the sound of the Editor’s voice? Do they seek knowledge from us that they could not obtain from other sources? Are we the fount of all known wisdom in the universe? What do we know and say that others don’t know and can’t say, which these decadent snoopers find so electrifying in our conversations? There must be SOME explanation for their manic preoccupation with what we have to say in our private communications.
WHY DO THEY LISTEN-IN TO EVERY WORD? WE’VE COMMITTED NO CRIMES
Because given that we have committed no crimes, and neither are we patriots terrorists, there HAS to be a coherent reason why these despicable little UK, US and foreign snooping apparatchiks rush to pick up their earpieces every time we begin a conversation – knocking over their plastic coffee cups and making a mess of their work spaces in their frantic anxiety to garner every precious nugget that falls from our lips. One can hear these scum clicking in one after the other.
Oh, the red light’s gone on, we’ve got to record what Story and his correspondents are saying. Why do they need to fall over themselves to find out what we discuss, as we have committed no crimes and are not terrorists?
And why are they routinely engaged in issuing threats against the Editor of this service, and also against Mr Cottrell, and harassing both on a routine basis – Mr Cottrell as recently as 6th March? The Editor, as previously reported, has received daily voicemail messages from a controlled MK-Ultra-style ‘Black’ US DVD nutcase via Skype (Washington, DC) since the Wanta ‘switch’ in February 2008: on some days, we have counted as many as nine such demented harassment calls.
WE’VE BEEN HARASSED DAILY WITH OBSCENE U.S. CALLS SINCE FEBRUARY 2008
These crude harassment calls, which as indicated have been continuing since the Wanta ‘switch’ in 2008, reminiscent of a DVD operation (because of their Bavarian Illuminati-style ‘Black’ content and because Germans never know when to stop, and when they have been defeated) have no effect on the Editor’s work, mind or intentions: yet some ignorant cadre inside the US component of the CIA/DVD revolutionary structures is employed, for money, to continue this illegal harassment.
They seem to think it will wear us down. Instead, the parties being worn down are those who are determined, despite our exposures of their iniquity, to continue their racketeering operations in defiance of the Rule of Law that they despise.
They never thought they would encounter any opposition, and they have been on the wrong foot ever since we stood up to them. Real opposition was never anticipated.
What arrogance! What right do these little malodorous eavesdropping twerps have to intercept our telecommunications and to record what we have to say – sending, we understand, transcripts of our coveted exchanges to the White House?
What right do the National Security Agency, GCHQ, French, Israeli and German intelligence have to listen-in to our phone calls? Are we at the apex of human understanding? Do we dispense pearls of insight and wisdom so penetrating that that these little creeps cannot develop them from other sources? Now let’s broaden our enquiry further, leading in to the next question.
‘MR STORY IS A PROBLEM FOR THEM BUT THEY CAN HANDLE IT PROVIDED
WHAT HE EXPOSES IS BLOCKED FROM THE ‘MAINSTREAM’’
As displayed at the top of our report dated 2nd March 2010, Mr A. Clifton Hodges, Attorney for the 50,000 CMKM/CMKX scamees (whose CMKM stock was exploited when 2.25 trillion PHANTOM SHARES were floated via an illegal platform from WITHIN the Securities and Exchange Commission itself, under the criminal George W. Bush Administration (between June 2004 and October 2005)), was informed by an inside source that ‘Christopher Story is a problem for them, but they think they can handle it PROVIDED that what he exposes does not spill over into the ‘mainstream’ media’ [see our report dated 2nd March 2010].
The source of this information was a US official whose job it is to ENFORCE THE LAW, not to connive in violating it for purposes of expediency.
AS WE’VE COMMITTED NO CRIMES, AUTHORITIES SHOULD SUPPORT WHAT WE’RE
DOING TO HELP THEM DO THE JOB THEY ARE TOO CORRUPT TO DO UNAIDED
One would have thought that since what we are exposing is RAMPANT RACKETEERING AND CRIMINALITY WITHIN THE U.S. GOVERNMENT STRUCTURES, as well as inside the corrupted financial institutions, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the criminal enterprise known as the Central Intelligence Agency, such US operatives and officials would be only too keen on encouraging the broad dissemination of information liable to lead to the indictment and arrest of the racketeers and criminals that are being protected within and close to the Washington Beltway.
But that is not the case! On the contrary, this and other ‘inside’ sources appear to have been engaged in a systematic operation to use Story, Cottrell and now Hodges as a foil and barrier, behind which to plan double-dealing and continued financial deception, and to deceive at least the first two named, in order – as with the original Wanta deception – to preserve a smokescreen as cover for the pursuit of racketeering ‘business as usual’ in general.
The intention here has been to try to conduct the US Dollar Refunding themselves, with FRNs – which will lead very rapidly to a catastrophe, so that the racketeers below the radar can then, so they imagine, unscramble and release their accumulated and worthless nominal ‘derivative’ values from off-balance sheet and offshore sources, for deployment (as is currently happening to some extent) for the Fascist-style purpose of snapping up real assets at firesale prices.
•That’s the goal of the World Revolution.
THEY FALL OVER THEMSELVES TO LISTEN-IN, SO THEY CAN WARN
THE GUTLESS ‘MAINSTREAM’ OUTLETS TO BLOCK OUR EXPOSURES
So, on the one hand, the eavesdroppers knock over their dirty plastic coffee cups as they fall over themselves to listen to and record what we have to say on the telephone; while on the other hand, they appear to be seeing to it that what we have to discuss, and what the Editor is exposing, never reaches beyond the in-house intelligence censorship ‘pods’ sitting inside all press rooms of the controlled ‘mainstream’ media, prompting the next question:
•Why are these manipulators so anxious to hear what we have to say and simultaneously so determined that what we have to say and expose never hits the ‘mainstream’?
After all, given that we have committed no crimes and are not terrorists, and the governments which these despicable little eavesdropping worms serve, supposedly believe in ‘democracy’ and ‘free speech’, don’t you know, it should surely follow that if the eavesdroppers consider that what we have to say is so superb and priceless, their governments would all be awfully keen that our invaluable information and insights should be spread extensively abroad so that the sum of human understanding is enhanced, to the benefit of all, the governments included, n’est-ce-pas?
ALL THEY DO IS INFORM US BY THEIR SORDID BEHAVIOUR THAT WE ARE RIGHT
‘ON MESSAGE’ – WHICH IS BEYOND STUPID OF THEM, WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT IT
There is of course one benefit to all this – namely, that by listening in to all our telecommunications so routinely and conspicuously, and by engaging in such persistent and futile non-stop telephone harassment (which is recorded by us for future legal reference, not listened to, and zapped), the criminal intelligence cadres concerned are signalling to us LOUD AND CLEAR that we are indeed being highly effective: otherwise they wouldn’t be wasting their time and financial resources in such underhand and counterproductive activities, would they.
So, as we have previously pointed out, these intelligence and masonic cadres are indeed plain STUPID! By their behaviour, they are telling us that we’re being effective, making a difference, and that we’re getting in the way of their racketeering operations by exposing them (as you will see from the next post!). So the confused, panicking fools are telling us all we need to know. It’s neat!
Obviously, there’s something wrong here: and one doesn’t need a first class degree in logic to be able to discern the problem. We haven’t committed any crimes and are not terrorists. Why, then, do these authorities compete among themselves not only to listen to and record what we have to say, but also to prevent the ‘mainstream’ from picking up our insights and assessments?
•ANSWER: Because the governments themselves are engaged in the very financial terrorist criminality and racketeering that we are exposing, and are terrified that the exposures will lead to what from their perspectives might become intolerable ‘unintended consequences’, with rolling outcomes that they couldn’t control. And this is in fact what is going to happen, sooner or later.
CRIMINALISED INTELLIGENCE POWER INCOMPATIBLE WITH SOUND GOVERNANCE
At this point we need to insert an obvious but almost always overlooked anomaly arising from the fact, mentioned in earlier reports, that the coexistence of criminalised, racketeering intelligence powers enjoying carte blanche to embezzle public funds and break the law (and to indulge in petty dirty tricks and bearing false witness such as those involving Gordon Thomas on behalf of MI-6: see Note (1) below), with a system supposedly based on the Rule of Law, is INCOMPATIBLE WITH SOUND GOVERNANCE – let alone with the supposed supremacy of legality.
If they prefer a system without the Rule of Law, why bother any longer with Congress and routinely rigged elections which make a mockery of democracy and just confirm that the US authorities, who hypocritically preach democracy to the Rest of the World, are indistinguishable from corrupt ‘post’-Soviet régimes, where ballot boxes (as in Ireland) are brought pre-stuffed to the polling stations?
Because the criminalised intelligence powers and those serving them:
•Exhibit open contempt for the Rule of Law, but exploit it on an open-ended basis when it suits their own nefarious purposes.
•Seek to avoid leaving traces which would contravene the law when committing their endless crimes, and yet employ every delaying and obfuscation device known to Satan, to save their own skins whenever they perceive they are themselves in danger of the full wrath of legal enforcement.
•Have failed actually to ABOLISH the Rule of Law which they exploit, injure and contravene 24/7 in their pursuit of their ‘Black’ and illegal objectives – which they imagine are ‘allowed’ in the United States thanks to the cover that they assume to be provided under the National Security Act of 1947 et seq. (the criminals’ charter).
RACKETEERS CONSTANTLY CONFRONTED WITH THE RULE OF LAW
This sick mindset was further encouraged in the United States by such ill-advised liberties as President Reagan’s counterproductive Executive Order 12333 of 1981, which catastrophically authorised US intelligence operatives to form corporations of which the operatives themselves could own the shares and which would then ostensibly ‘contract’ with the compartmentalised components of the Intelligence Power and other US agencies to perform tasks required by the Executive Branch, for which the controlling Intelligence Power acts as the clandestine arm.
Obviously, to contract with intelligence operatives who are required by Statute to deny that they are intelligence operatives and therefore to lie for a living, is equivalent to entering into a contract with the fox to guard the chicken house. Significantly, Gorbachëv’s Politburo copied this crass 1981 Reagan formula in 1990.
Therefore, while abusing and contravening the despised Rule of Law, these amoral US officials are constantly being confronted by it. Despite their disdain of the Rule of Law, it stands in their way, and they keep bumping into it, even though they do their best all the time to corrupt it.
This ironical state of affairs provides, of course, another convenient underlying, ongoing dialectic (Thesis, Antithesis) – ripe for exploitation: but in this particular case, the dialectic is a ‘given’, not an artificial construct. In other words, short of an actual criminal dictatorship, there’s not a lot they can do to alleviate their situation here other than to continue compromising, abusing and eroding the Rule of Law, through bribery and corruption.
We have established already that: the criminal governments themselves are engaged in the very racketeering criminality that we are having to expose, given not least that, as reviewed below, ALL SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL UNDER U.S. AND COMMON LAW – and are terrified that the endless exposures will lead to what, from their perspectives, might become truly intolerable ‘unintended consequences’, with rolling outcomes that they couldn’t control.
COWARDLY CONTROLLED NEWSPAPERS WHICH HAVE IGNORED CIMKM/CMKX
Because of this cowardice on the penetrated governments’ part, the newspapers listed below have been officially prevented, to our own certain updated knowledge [10th March], from reporting even the eminently reportable CMKM/CMKX case, in which payment of $3.87 trillion is demanded from the Securities and Exchange Commission and from certain of its current and former officials, given the unprecedented scandal of the S.E.C. having floated 2.25 trillion PHANTOM SHARES from a platform operated beneath the cover of the Securities and Exchange Commission itself (2).
•Note: Page B1 of the New York Edition of The New York Times dated 12th March carries the first 'mainstream' report of the CMKM/CMKX case, twisted to ignore the essence of the case and to suggest, contrary to the truth of the matter, that this is just another instance of the phenomenon that scamees can never admit that they have been scammed. Naturally, one did not expect such a newspaper to report the truth, which can be established from the Complaint [see our report dated 9th January (over two months prior to The New York Times' article)]. No, the newspaper found a spurious, populist angle which has nothing to do with the substance of the Complaint against the S.E.C., indicating how nervous the US Establishment is over these developments.
Any ‘mainstream’ newspaper that was fulfilling its responsibilities objectively as a conscientious component of the Fourth Estate would have jumped on this story long ago. After all, we published the complete text of the Complaint within hours of it being filed [see our report dated 9th January 2010]. That was TWO MONTHS BACK: and so far, NONE of the ‘mainstream’ US/UK newspapers or broadcast outlets have touched this dynamite. SPECIFICALLY:
•Mr A. Clifton Hodges, Attorney for the 50,000+ CMKM/CMKX scammees, personally informed press contacts about the case, on the following media:
•The Los Angeles Times
•The Washington Post
•The Wall Street Journal
Mr Hodges received no response.
•The Editor of this service personally informed the prominent UK financial journalist Ambrose Evans-Pritchard on The Daily Telegraph, whom he has met in the past. Since The Daily Telegraph’s offices are within walking distance of our Central London office, the Editor offered to deliver a copy of the actual Summons and Complaint by hand last week.
•The Editor did not even receive the courtesy of an acknowledgment of his emails.
THE DAILY TELEGRAPH: A CONTROLLED OUTLET FOR MI-6
Notwithstanding his duplicitous behaviour in acting as an agent for MI-6 in bearing false witness against the Editor of this service in 2004, Gordon Thomas is persona grata at The Daily Telegraph, and recently published a large article in that paper on the subject of the use of British passports by Israel assassination operatives. As the Editor’s case shows, Thomas also acts as an agent for MI-6.
Therefore, The Daily Telegraph is under the thumb of MI-6, which helps to explain quite why this newspaper – which used to publish extensive op-ed. articles by the Editor of this service in the 1970s and early 1960s, until the takeover by the since disgraced and jailed corrupt globalist felon Conrad Black – has failed so far in its duty as a key member of the Fourth Estate to report (a) the biggest official corruption case to come to Court in world history and (b) the biggest and most-far-reaching exposure of government and financial institution racketeering since the world began.
MI-6 ‘INTEND TO TAKE MR CHRISTOPHER STORY OUT’
At about 10.45pm on Sunday 7th March, the Editor was informed via a transatlantic phone call that the Editor’s correspondent had been informed by an ‘inside’ source directly connected with MI-9 (MI-6) that ‘MI-6 intend to ‘take Mr Story out’’. Apparently the intention was or is to prepare one or more ‘stings’ and traps, in the hope that the Editor will fall into them, as happened once or twice before (given that, since these people only ‘do’ deception, it is almost impossible to avoid being deceived at some stage: except that the longer they drag out their cynical games, the easier it becomes to read their criminal minds and the unchanging techniques they use (the devil isn’t a great inventor)): so the deeper the discernment one eventually acquires, and the less chance do they have of pulling off a targeted dirty trick, as intended.
The Editor enquired why this evil intent should have surfaced at this late stage in the racketeering exposure proceedings: to which the answer was: ‘They want to move on by fixing things below the radar, they are furious that you have so much information, and they want to make sure you don’t publicise the outcome, especially concerning the Dollar Refunding which they have resisted so hard, when it happens’. To which the Editor responded words to the following effect: ‘Well, a gentleman’s word is his bond. They can walk across the bridge and ring our office doorbell’.
‘They wouldn’t do that. They’d sting you instead’.
Quite right: they can’t do that now, as they have squandered so many resources trying to entrap and trip the Editor up, that a ‘gentlemanly approach’ wouldn’t work now. It would probably have worked back in 2002: but not now. If you have been deceived and abused already by your own (let alone the hideous, criminalised American) intelligence services, you aren’t likely to succumb to such a ‘gentlemanly approach’. They burned their boats.
•Not very clever: but then again, as we've seen, these people are extraordinarily STUPID.
BRITISH INTELLIGENCE APPEARS TO BE BEHAVING TREACHEROUSLY, AS USUAL
Anyway, thanks for the heads-up – reiterated, by the way, by the faux-demented DVD ‘Black’ Psy-Ops voice who’s being paid to plague us daily since the completion of the Leo Wanta ‘switch’ in February 2008 (as revisited briefly above). So, what we have is the following devilish equation:
(1): The Editor of this service is a patriotic supporter of the nation state, is exactly what he says he is and has been for decades [see our testimonials], is viscerally opposed to the pagan, decadent, debauched World Revolution and its filthy ‘Black’ social and geopolitical detritus which is such a menace to civilisation, is a loyal subject of Her Majesty the Queen (with no other such connections whatsoever), believes (whether you like it or not) that Jesus Christ is the Lord, and is come in the flesh, and has stood up forcefully (because we have no choice, not because of any courage) to the abominations, abuses, verbal abuse and agitprop tirades, betrayals, successive threats (including seven death threats), innumerable lies and attempted ‘stings’, and the cynical exploitation by Mr Wanta of the Editor’s integrity and expertise; and has nevertheless sought to expose elements of the officially perpetrated and condoned racketeering and embezzlement of US taxpayers’ funds, and the myriad other Fraudulent Finance atrocities perpetrated with impunity under five self-acknowledged criminal Presidents of the United States.
(2): In exchange for which, conniving British intelligence cadres, according to the US ‘insider’ source whose identity is known to the Editor, are actively seeking ‘as we speak’ to ‘take Story out’ and to try, once again – à la Gordon Thomas – to discredit him.
This is to be the Editor’s reward for the serial abuse, deceit, lies, attempted ‘stings’, deceptions and other pathetic, underhand travesties, that the Editor has suffered in recent years in exposing these crimes. And these abuses, by the way, are AS NOTHING compared to what others, especially Michael C. Cottrell, have suffered at the hands of these serial thieves, racketeers and reprobate operatives over a much longer period of time.
•The Editor personally sent emails last week giving details of the CMKM/CMKX case to 14 well-known newspapers in India, Pakistan, China, Hong Kong, Malaysia and The Philippines, with the coordinates of Mr Hodges so that their journalists could check everything with the source. At the time of this posting, there had been no response.
‘MAINSTREAM’ NEWSPAPERS REVEALING THEMSELVES
TO BE CO-CONSPIRATORS IN COVERING UP THE RACKETEERING
None of this surprises us, given the above, nor does it even suggest that the Dark Forces are not in the process of being defeated. On the contrary, by cow-towing to their criminalised governments and intelligence communities, these newspapers are just allowing themselves to be tarred with the same Black Racketeering Brush that has covered the known official and financial criminalists with sticky black gunge that runs down into the sewer.
All that these media outlets are doing by ignoring these investigations is to confirm that they, too, are parties to, minded to be in favour of, and doubtless in many cases participants in, the familiar Fraudulent Finance racketeering practices that the perpetrators are trying in vain to cover up. In some US cases (known to this service), key media outlets are recipients of giant bribes paid out specifically in order to prevent them from covering these investigations.
We haven’t yet revealed the identities of the US news media concerned; but if there exists such a phenomenon as an honest journalist working for any of them, we would remind such persons of the basic reality that the bribee is actually in a stronger position than the distributor of the bribe – who won’t want to be exposed.
His bribe is presumably held in place by threats of lethal consequences, or blackmail: but these implied or actual threats are usually empty and cannot be fulfilled without entangling the source of the bribe in a cauldron of problems arising from his iniquity that he would wish to avoid.
WHY CONFINING EXPOSURES TO THIS WEBSITE HAS BEEN
COUNTERPRODUCTIVE FROM THE RACKETEERS’ PERSPECTIVE
And by adopting the strategy of trying to confine these exposures of official and financial sector racketeering to this website (even though some indications of broader coverage, with which we are associated, are ‘in the pipeline’), the US cover-up cadres have managed (counterproductively, from their disoriented perspective) to contrive that a reasonably consistent corpus of information has emerged into the public domain, as well as being captured for posterity and current research in successive issues of International Currency Review, which has official, central bank, institutional and library subscribers throughout the world – thereby precluding any possibility of the heirs of the perpetrators rewriting history so as to ‘airbrush’ this financial racketeering out of the record.
OUR EXPOSURE MODUS OPERANDI: 'WALKING IN A STRAIGHT LINE'
Proceeding now to our modus operandi, we reiterate that our method is the straightforward one of ‘walking in a straight line’. Unlike your agents of influence and disinformation outlets – including notorious website peddlers of ‘Black Propaganda’, lies and confusion operating under Intelligence Power instructions to maximise the potential of the 'Black' fog of disinformation for the purpose of covering up the racketeering – our method, having done our due diligence to the extent possible, is to publish what we have learned either directly or else covered by a necessary ‘to the best of our knowledge and belief’ caution.
When we obtain information which can only be forthcoming from ‘inside’ and, very often, from dissident and double-crossed intelligence sources (because these people are always bitterly at loggerheads internally), we may publish such information ‘straight’ with no qualifications at all.
An example of this was our revelation that the late former Governor of the Bank of England, Lord ‘Eddie’ George, had been arrested and briefly jailed in July 2007. We have only recently learned, and publicised, WHY Lord George was arrested.
Lord George was seized because of his rôle in aiding, abetting and facilitating, with the criminal operative Dr Alan Greenspan, the stealing/diversion of The Queen’s gold on 29th-30th March 2007, as we reported six weeks or so later. Lord George, who died in April 2009, was instrumental in exchanging the gold for worthless pieces of ‘derivatives’ paper.
QUEEN’S GOLD THEFT STILL NOT RECTIFIED:
SO, KICK THE U.S. AMBASSADOR OUT OF LONDON
That operation represented the Bush-CIA-DVD’s biggest theft ever; AND IT STILL HASN’T BEEN RECTIFIED. If UK Governments consisted of people with conviction, knowledge and backbone, instead of the usual blackmailed, compromised and controlled psychological cases with dirty intelligence backgrounds, the American Ambassador should be ordered out of Britain, with his Embassy peremptorily closed sine die – until such time as this unspeakable assault has been resolved. When we mentioned this demand, which we first made in the summer of 2007, to a US contact, she said: ‘That’s precisely what the pan-Germans and the covert Soviets want’.
•To which our response is: SO WHAT?
If Lord George had even contemplated instructing his solicitors to try to obtain a retraction from us, he would immediately have been told advised nothing could be done because Christopher Story’s information was accurate (even though it was obtained from secret sources), and that Lord George couldn’t know what back-up information Mr Story held in support of his revelations.
In any case, to challenge such a report would certainly have embroiled the former Governor of the Bank of England in a dangerous encounter. Far better to assume that the sensational report would remain ‘buried’ in International Currency Review, and also covered by the Gordon Thomas MI-6 ‘blanket false witness’ lies about the Editor to the gullible so-called ‘mainstream’ media.
STEALING OF $4.2 TRILLION TAX MONEY ON 31ST DECEMBER 2009
STILL NOT RECTIFIED: SO MASSIVE CRIMES HAVE BEEN COMMITTED
Likewise, when we reported that the tax on the Settlements monies had indeed been subtracted effective 31st December 2009, we had obtained hard information to that effect, backing up ‘inside’ information provided via impeccably reliable sources. Specifically, we received an email at 20:24 UK time, on 1st January 2010, from a key figure involved in the Settlements (said by key US ‘inside’ sources, who may have been lying to our contacts, to be briefed to pay off corrupt US politicians) who was in almost daily contact with us by email under a pseudonym for over two and a half years, stating that: ‘sources here [in Dallas] and in Europe told me my taxes were taken off the top on or before 12/31 in order for them to be credited into Fiscal 2009. I got that word Wednesday 12/30/09’.
Since these taxes have not been restored to the Settlements funds which had not been paid out by the 45-day deadline of 14th February (by which date the funds from which the taxes had been taken should by law have been remitted):
•WHERE IS THAT TAX MONEY?
•WAS IT STOLEN AND IF SO, WHO STOLE IT, MR GEITHNER?
•WAS IT PLACED OUT ON CONTRACT, after $100 billion had been siphoned off into the hands of a well-known US false religion as we have reported, and if so, who is or was the foreign corrupt counterparty? Brazil? Zimbabwe? Denmark? Deutsche Bank, Frankfurt?
China Trust Bank? Barclays Bank?
•WHO are the foreign counterparties that have collaborated with the criminals in the White House, the US Treasury, the State Department and the CIA to STEAL over $4.0 trillion from the account of the US taxpayer, and imagine that there will be no 'consequences'?
Of course, the problem that the official racketeers faced was that the tax accruals ‘could not be placed into the taxpayers’ accounts’ – because, suddenly, the $4.5 trillions squandered by the current reckless Obama Government would have been restored overnight – raising questions about SOURCE OF FUNDS. Ah, so THAT’s why there’s been a blackout across the board of these exposures and investigations, is it? Well, no: as will be shown, it’s much worse than that.
•They couldn't pay the tax monies into the taxpayers' accounts: so they just STOLE IT, which was what they always intended to do, anyway.
•Keep asking yourself basic questions like: WOULD THEY STEAL IT? THE ANSWER TO SUCH BASIC QUESTIONS CONCERNING THESE DESPERATE CRIMINALS IS: SURE. NATURLICH.
As can be seen from Mr Hodges’ letter to the Office of the New York State Attorney General [see our report dated 2nd March 2010], we know [and in any case, see above] that these tax monies were not ‘replaced’ back into the Settlements pool – as a consequence of which the perpetrators now face extremely severe criminal sanctions, as Mr Hodges has pointed out to Andrew Cuomo’s office when demanding an investigation, given that some of the main perpetrators, and many of his own client CMKM/CMKX victims (whose monies appear to be tied up with the Settlements funds) are resident in the State of New York [See Note 3].
How is it possible that this grievous official criminality and blatant racketeering has continued, notwithstanding these exposures (albeit in the context of the complicit and cowardly failure of the Fourth Estate to do its job properly)?
FISH ROTS FROM THE STINKING HEAD: WORLD COURT IMMUNITY DEMANDED
AND SCANDALOUSLY OBTAINED BY THE COLLECTIVE OF CORRUPT U.S. PRESIDENTS
The starting point here will be to remind you that FISH ROTS FROM THE HEAD and that we have reported that in or around September 2009, five US Presidents – Carter (39), Bush Senior (41), Clinton (42), Bush Junior (43) and Obama (44) DEMANDED IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION from the World Court. This immunity was, we were told, GRANTED – in a disgraceful abuse of power by the World Court, which appears to have caved in to Mr Obama’s DEMAND on behalf of himself and his four criminal predecessors.
As we can see from this episode, President Obama has been in lock-step with these four criminal predecessors – which eliminates all residual (courtesy) expectations that he might have had the guts to stand up to these racketeers. That would, however, have been impossible – since this operative, whatever his background, is of course a placeman and a puppet of the controlling criminalised US Intelligence Power.
We can thus state without fear of contradiction on the basis of the foregoing information that the five US Presidents openly acknowledge that THEY ARE CRIMINALS. If you are not a criminal, you do not need immunity from prosecution. These operatives, working together as a PRESIDENTIAL COLLECTIVE, demanded and received the immunity from prosecution that they sought.
That of course means that the World Court which sustains the figleaf of legality at the corrupted intergovernmental level (where in fact the Rule of Law does not operate properly or at all, or can be non-existent) is COMPLICIT IN LETTING ALL THESE CRIMINALS OFF THE HOOK – in other words, condones criminality at the highest level, irrespective of the consequences (which in this context includes destroying the lives, savings, hopes and physical assets of hundreds of thousands and probably millions of victims).
In translation, the World Court appears to regard its job as DEFENDING RACKETEERS IN HIGH PLACES – not to sustain the Rule of Law at the intergovernmental level without fear or favour.
GORBACHEV MANIPULATING DEVELOPMENTS FROM HIS WING IN THE KREMLIN. AS BEFORE
Behind this scandal of scandals, lies the deeper reality which we have publicised but which none of the ‘mainstream’ media has picked up on, and which, we are informed, is now of ‘no interest’ to the present generation. We refer to the PROVEN FACT that former President Mikhail Gorbachëv, who fronted ‘collapsible Communism’ for the benefit of the confused ‘mainstream media’ and strutted the stage for years thereafter (and indeed continues to do so, to this day), collaborated AND STILL COLLABORATES with the Black Godfather of the criminally penetrated US Intelligence Power, the Langley base of which is labelled the George Bush Center for Intelligence.
GORBACHEV, BUSH, KOHL, ACKERMANN: RACKETEERING PARTNERS IN DEUTSCHE AG.
Specifically, as we have exclusively reported, Gorbachëv is a partner with George H. W. Bush Sr. and Dr Helmut Kohl, the former Chancellor of Germany, together with Dr Joseph Ackermann, in Deutsche AG., formerly Barrington Investment Group, St. Gallen, Switzerland, which handles the illegal proceeds of racketeering operations – as was the case with the proceeds derived from the stealing of a contract belonging to Mr Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., and which was facilitated by the ‘electronic stealing and forging’ of Mr Cottrell’s signature. The background detail to these crimes is re-presented herewith:
•Former President Mikhail S. Gorbachev, working with former US President George H. W. Bush Sr., former German Chancellor Dr Helmut Kohl and Dr Joseph Ackermann, all partners in Deutsche AG (formerly Barrington Investment Group), Switzerland, stole a contract using the electronic tag to the securities account owned by Mr Michael C. Cottrell’s Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., with Benchmark Securities, Inc., New Jersey, at a table-top meeting in Geneva on 7th October 2002 by the means described below, which included the electronic ‘forging’ of Mr Cottrell’s signature.
This theft was preceded by seven related thefts from Mr Cottrell’s firm’s securities account.
•This means that former President Mikhail Gorbachev and former German Chancellor Helmut Kohl are financial criminals like George H. B. Bush Sr., and should be treated accordingly.
Mr Gorbachev and Helmut Kohl have, as partners in Deutsche AG, by definition been profiting from the theft of Mr Cottrell’s contract and property, and also from huge proceeds from the theft of The Queen’s gold, which, we were specifically informed at 1.15 am by telephone on 4th February 2010, have likewise been channelled through Deutsche AG, St Gallen, Switzerland.
•As of 10th March 2010, The Queen’s gold had not been restored.
•The proceeds of innumerable corrupt transactions involving Gorbachëv, Bush Sr., Kohl and Ackermann have been run through the DVD’s main institutions, Deutsche Bank and Dresdner Bank.
So what is being exposed is that George H. W. Bush Sr. (CIA/DVD) and Mikhail Gorbachev (Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) and KGB/FSB) have been systematically ransacking American and non-American victims alike, and running this colossal open-ended racketeering through Germany, with the assistance of the former STASI of East Germany (who are GESTAPO in relabelled clothing).
Hence the presence on the scene of STASI operatives such as Eva Teleki, a (separate) ‘Swedish’ opera singer, and other dirty operatives suspected of being continuing STASI agents, such as Chancellor Angela Merkel (the former Secretary of the Agitation and Propaganda Department of the Young Communists at Marx Lenin University, in East Berlin). This explains why Merkel was earlier fingered by this service as the guardian in Germany of George H W Bush Sr.'s stolen and exploited racketeering assets with German institutions.
•Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin (Shalomov), who is a senior Soviet GRU operative, was based in East Germany before he migrated to Leningrad, and is believed to have been primarily responsible for orchestrating, at least from the Soviet side, the clockwork 'collapsible Communism' operations in Eastern Europe. Gorbachev has been reported to us to operate from a wing of the Kremlin, as though he never left the place.
•Which he didn't. He's been at the centre of this revolutionary criminality THROUGHOUT.
WANTA: THE COURIER BETWEEN BUSH SENIOR AND GORBACHEV
Reconsider now the unsavoury, treacherous rôle of Mr Leo/Lee Wanta in this context. As we have repeatedly shown [see our reports dated 20th September 2009, 22nd October 2009, 17th November 2009 and 29th January 2010 for instance], Wanta’s ‘Principality of Snake Hill’ cover, which provides him with a fraudulent virtual ‘Ambassadorship’ from the non-existent 'Principality of Snake Hill' to the United States ‘enabling’ him to continue using the false self-designation ‘Ambassador’, is the clumsy concoction of an undischarged felon who has stolen inter alia this Editor’s $35,000 loan plus interest and other monies, cannot own a bank account because he is a felon, and not only answers the telephone in German with ‘GUTEN TAG’, but spells telephone TELEFON, Groupe with an ‘e’ as in French, while also masquerading behind this false front using a 202 telephone number provided by the French Embassy in Washington, DC.
Thus AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc, with ‘Groupe’ spelt as in French, was a French/DVD operation set up with the assistance of the former French Ambassador to Washington, DC, Monsieur Levitte, now President Sarkozy’s top intelligence advisor – its purpose being to steal/divert funds on behalf of the Bush-CIA-DVD racketeers for which the bilateral treaty-bound Vichy-French authorities, being complicit with the pan-Germans in this corruption (think of the 3,000+ Bush-linked accounts with Paribas in Paris), provide permanent cover.
No wonder Wanta, who had operated out of Vienna in the late 1980s and early 1990s, had to sack Michael Cottrell as Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. (which he did ‘illegally’ on 23rd March 2008: see website reports) when it became obvious that Cottrell and Story were hot on the trail of this devious foreign operation to steal vast funds belonging to the United States of America and its taxpayers. Against this background, please be reminded [see our report dated the 20th September 2009] that Wanta’s nauseating ‘excess patriotism’ and ‘apple-pie Americanism’ is ALL FAKE – part of his elaborate but now exposed cover, as is his false religiosity. Recall Story’s Third Law: ‘Sooner or later all operations and covers are BLOWN’.
WANTA’S ‘REAGAN’S JUNK-YARD DOG’ DIVERSION
Wanta told Claire Sterling, the late author of Thieves’ World [published by the CIA’s favourite book publisher, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1994], and also reconfirmed personally to the Editor of this service, that President Reagan used to refer to Wanta as his ‘junkyard dog’.
He told the Editor that George Bush Sr. was ‘never in the room when Ronald Reagan briefed me’. This statement conflicts with the reality, which has been emphatically reconfirmed to this Editor from ‘inside’ sources, that Wanta was indeed the courier between George Bush Senior and Mikhail Gorbachëv (who are, as indicated, joint partners with Dr Helmut Kohl and Dr Joseph Ackermann in Barrington Investment Group, now Deutsche AG, St Gallen, Switzerland: see above etc.).
So it transpires that Wanta systematically lies and lied to his contacts, including the Editor of this service, whose platform and expertise he exploited to provide a smokescreen behind which the Bush-CIA-DVD racketeers, which Wanta served, could continue unimpeded under the crook Henry M. Paulson’s supervision from the US Treasury.
•We did wonder why we encountered no interference from the highest US level for the first year while Wanta was using us in the manner described.
WANTA KNEW ABOUT 9/11 IN ADVANCE, LIKE VREELAND
Wanta was released from jail just over a week after 9/11, was collected from prison by Gerald Salchert, of Austrian extraction, and taken to a relative’s house in Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin. Because of his experiences at the hands of the Bush-Clinton Crime Syndicate (given that these mentally deranged capos always treat their underlings with cruelty), there was concern that his prior knowledge of the 9/11 abomination might be leaked prior to the event – which is in fact what the Office of Naval Intelligence and prospective/actual assassin, Lt. Mark Delmart Vreeland, did from jail in Toronto, after he had opened three diplomatic bags, which is treason.
In March 2005, the Pentagon-associated US operative nicknamed ‘The Visitor’, calling himself Walker whose real name is Demchuk, who pestered the Editor for information about the Soviet-originated Iraqi WMD-removal (‘Sarindar’) programme, informed the Editor that ‘Vreeland is in solitary confinement for a very long time, his case has been sealed and he is no longer a threat to you’ (Vreeland having threatened the Editor with death in 2003). Vreeland’s parole board meeting has been pencilled in for a date in 2163, according to an informed US source.
FRANCE COVERS FOR GERMANY UNDER TREATY OF THE ELYSEE
Under the Treaty of the Elysée dated January 1963, which is of indefinite duration, France and Germany are both required to coordinate their stances on all external matters, on which they are required to ‘reach an analogous position’. France is therefore indistinguishable from Germany in respect of international strategic deception operations (especially as there are special intelligence collaboration provisions under the Treaty), and accordingly fronts extensively for Germany.
In this particular context, it provides flimsy (and disintegrating, or disintegrated) cover for the Abwehr operative, Leo Wanta, who was indeed the courier between George H. W. Bush Sr. and Mikhail Gorbachev [see our report dated 4th February 2010]. Although he says he’s Polish, we think this felon and fraudster may be a DVD operative/double agent, possibly STASI.
The German Chancellor, Angela Merkel – formerly the Secretary of the Agitation and Propaganda Department of the Communist Yugend at Marx-Lenin University, East Berlin – is a STASI operative.
FRAUDULENT WANTA ‘SNAKE HILL’ WEBSITE’S GERMAN CONNECTIONS
Further research has revealed a direct German connection with the clumsy ‘Principality of Snake Hill’ deception, which we have demolished, not least with the imprimatur of Ms Brenda Farrell, an official at the Australian Embassy in Dublin, who replied to our Irish associate’s enquiry as follows:
Forwarded message
From: <richardsharpe@eircom.net>
Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:25 PM
Subject: Fwd: Principality of Snake Hill [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
To: mrrichardsharpe <mrrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
richardsharpe@eircom.net wrote:
Many thanks for your timely response.
Regards
Richard
"Austremb Dublin" <Austremb.Dublin@dfat.gov.au> wrote:
Dear Mr Sharpe,
Thank you for your email.
There is no principality in Australia.
Kind regards
Australian Embassy
Dublin
Tel: +353 (0) 1 664 5300
Fax: +353 (0) 1 678 5185
richardsharpe@eircom.net
The German connection exposed herewith below, reveals the low calibre of these operatives, whose arrogance and certainty that they will never be exposed, is such that they don’t put much expertise into their deception operations if they can help it. A sane person would have thought that in ‘designing’ the ‘Principality of Snake Hill’ deception, they would have used some common sense and established an actual domain name, rather than using freeware sites.
One of the ‘Snake Hill’ websites
[http://members.multimania.co.uk/snakehill/]
causes computers to display a warning [viewable at: http://safeweb.norton.com/report/show?url=multimania.co.uk].
That warning is really for the entire ‘Multimania.co.uk’ domain, not just the fake ‘/snakehill’ subset. But it is interesting, to put it mildly, to note that the website’s location is: GERMANY. Why would a GERMAN site use a United Kingdom domain identifier?
•ESPECIALLY on a site noted for hosting THOUSANDS of Trojan threats: except that the answer presents itself immediately: it’s a DVD operation.
Yes, the entire website is HOSTED IN GERMANY, so Wanta's ‘/snakehill’ subdirectory on this domain absolutely emanates from GERMANY as well. The following is the actual Whois Internet registration data (fully available at http://who.is/whois/multimania.co.uk/):
IP: 213.131.252.254
IP Location: Dusseldorf*, Germany
*Note: Wanta’s lawyer, Steve Goodwin, was born in Dusseldorf.
Domain name: multimania.co.uk
Registrant: conversis GmbH
Registrant type: Unknown
Registrant's address: Patrick Kirchhoff, Erftstrasse 11, Duisburg 47051, Germany
Registrar: InterNetWire Communications GmbH [Tag = INTERNETWIRE-DE]
URL: http://www.internetwire.de
Relevant dates: Registered on: 12-Feb-2009
Renewal date: 12-Feb-2011
Last updated: 23-Apr-2009
Registration status: Registered until renewal date.
Name servers: ns1.conversis.de; ns2.conversis.de
WHOIS lookup made at 02:44:25 27-Feb-2010
As you can now start to see, our original assessment that the United States and Britain are in thrall to the GERMAN enemy that they never defeated, which we have maintained without deviation ever since those ‘gasps’ emitted by eavesdroppers during a telephone call several years ago made by the Editor to Wanta (joined by his former lawyer, Thomas Henry or Heinrich, a.k.a. Mr ‘Nasty’) is being confirmed by more and more evidence that is accumulating all the time.
In addition to using the French as a convenient, permanent front for their continuing hegemony operations, the pan-German Nazi long-range strategic deception heirs of the Abwehr, Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD), collaborate with the covert Soviets (Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU), and the KGB/FSB, in formulating, implementing and consolidating their comprehensive, failing revolutionary hegemony operations against the Main Enemy (Britain and the United States).
•That’s quite easy, since the heirs of the Abwehr and of Heinrich Himmler OWN THE CIA.
CIA/DVD PRACTICE OF EXPLOITING AND STEALING OUTSIDE EXPERTISE
Now it is standard CIA 'tradecraft' practice to usurp the expertise of outside professional talent if it is not available in-house or by some other means. In this context, the CIA perpetrators needed a US securities expert with impeccable credentials and a securities account. What the CIA does is apply its standard Bush-style ‘bait and switch’ technique, exploiting and maximising the potential of the usurped professional expertise, before rejecting it and stealing the assets associated with it.
Note that Wanta likewise used this Editor’s website and publishing platform in pursuing his own agendas for 15 months, telling Mr Cottrell in October 2007 that ‘we must get rid of Chris Story, but don’t tell him’. Mr Cottrell having formed his own view of Wanta’s unreliability, Teutonic arrogance and duplicity, carefully found a way to warn the Editor of this ‘switch’ in December 2007, without actually revealing what he could not then reveal.
In March 2008, Wanta fired Cottrell by issuing a vituperative three-page ‘Resolution of the Sole Shareholder’ (which is illegal, as corporate resolutions can only legally be issued by the Board at a Board Meeting: the text of this document used language familiar to the Editor of this service as having been written by Thomas Henry (‘Mr Nasty’)).
Relieved, Mr Cottrell then despatched the necessary resignation information to the tax authorities in Richmond, VA, requesting them to send all subsequent paperwork, including tax demands, to Wanta in Wisconsin – where he had long stated that he is not resident and does not run a business. The rest of this sequence can be gleaned from our website: see March 2008.
So what the cynical Intelligence Power routinely does is ‘borrow’ external expertise, before discarding or stealing it. In the Editor’s case, ‘bait and switch’ has worked both ways: it could be argued that we ourselves have done a ‘switch’, taking a leaf out of these deceivers’ book.
Meanwhile, the same happened to Mr Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. Because the standard CIA procedure of exploiting, then stealing and discarding outside expertise and assets, also explains Wanta’s ‘use’ of Mr Cottrell for his failed AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. DVD stealing operation – because Michael C. Cottrell has the requisite securities market expertise and securities account facilities, which were (mistakenly) applied for the benefit of Mr Wanta’s AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. (but which cannot be used without Mr Cottrell’s signature: so we shall see whether it has again been stolen).
[Note: This analysis was written BEFORE the incredible fraud perpetrated via the State of Pennsylvania, subject of our separate report, was known. Quite prophetic, you may think].
Note also that Steven Goodwin, the Wanta Attorney in Richmond, VA, who accepted this Editor's $35,000, which Wanta stole, was born, as stated previously, in Dusseldorf. Goodwin wrote the shifty loan documents which Leo Wanta demanded that the Editor sign forthwith, as soon as the Editor arrived on 10th June 2005 at his relative’s address in Chippewa Falls.
Wanta took it for granted that the Editor would meet his preremptory demand to sign, and wouldn’t walk out on the spot (which he nearly did).
[INSERTION: The Editor received an email on 9th March from a US correspondent who said he had asked Mr Wanta why he hadn't paid the Editor's loan plus interest back on the due date (or at all). Wanta replied that Mr Story had been 'offered' the choice of a 'Biblical' payment of ten times the orginal loan (no such 'Biblical norm exists, by the way), or payment of the amount due on the due date. This is a fabrication. No such choice was ever offered: in any case it contains what is known as an 'illusory promise': see the securitisation analysis below. Another Wanta fabrication/slither].
THE AMERICAN INTELLIGENCE POWER WHICH HAS USURPED
THE GOVERNMENT DANCES TO THE TUNE OF FOREIGN POWERS
As for the stealing of Mr Cottrell’s contract and the electronic forging of his signature – a specific case of which we have detailed information [see above], which proves the ongoing racketeering collaboration between Bush, Gorbachëv and Kohl from the outset – it has been shown not only that Gorbachëv, Bush Sr., Helmut Kohl and Ackermann are handling stolen accruals (4) (the money that you make from stealing my money, is my money), but also that the US Intelligence Power dances to the tune of the foreign power whom George H. W. Bush represents, namely Germany – whom the Allies were supposed to have defeated in 1945.
Working closely at the intelligence level with the Nazi Continuum is the covert Soviet Continuum – both of which ‘Black’ Revolutionary Forces went underground: the Nazi (pan-German) Continuum went underground well before the defeat of Hitler, and the Soviet Continuum went underground in 1991, remaining under the supervision of ‘former’ President Gorbachëv, who, as indicated above, occupies a large suite of offices inside the Kremlin to this day.
As the Editor of Soviet Analyst, this Editor believes that GORBACHEV calls the shots – as he did from the moment this former Secretary of the CPSU Administrative Department came to power after the ‘festival of three funerals’ of abruptly deceased (murdered) Soviet leaders, in 1985.
We also believe that the concerted offensive to ‘take down’ the ‘Main Enemy’ (Britain and the United States) is the TWIN operation following on from the ‘takedown’ of the Soviet Union – and furthermore, that this massive operation is perpetrated by THE SAME TOP THREE OPERATIVES who ransacked the USSR: Gorbachëv, Bush Senior and Helmut Kohl.
WORLD REVOLUTION RACKETEERING OFFENSIVE
In other words, what we are exposing is a colossal World Revolution programme, from which these three racketeers and handlers of stolen monies have benefited and continue to benefit personally. [Well, they can't be expected to run the World Revolution for altruistic motives, can they].
The extent to which Metabridge (Mossad, DVD, CIA and MI-6) is implicated in this gigantic anti-nation state World Revolution operation will quite probably be exposed when it transpires whether or not the two high-level MI-6 officers in the United States who were reported to us to be holding The Queen’s signature authority for the Settlements and her hijacked loan funds, may be double-crossing the Monarch. Given that everyone appears to have been double-crossing everyone else, anything is possible and nothing can be taken for granted: the Pennsylvania episode lends support to our suspicions on this score.
The Allies defeated Herr Adolf Schickelgrüber (Hitler), NOT Germany. On the contrary, assisted by the absorption by and penetration of the CIA by multiple ‘rehabilitated’ Nazis thanks to that ‘reverse takeover’ masterminded in the 1940s with treacherous US State Department connivance inter alia by General Reinhard Gehlen – the thuggish Abwehr Nazi intelligence chief who had overseen the repression in the German-occupied areas of the Soviet Union – the CIA became the main ‘active’ component of the Nazi Continuum. This accounts for its hideous Himmlerian abominations over the years, its satanic experimentation operations, its ‘Black’ offensives against the American people and the Rest of the World, its Nazi-type military aggressiveness and its repulsive arrogance, its absolute disdain of and hatred for the Rule of Law, and the reality that it is much more dangerous nowadays than the KGB-GRU ever was.
So what we are actually confronting is indeed the Nazi Continuum, secretly supported as always by (covert) Soviet Communism – the US component of which, at the present time, is headed by Leon Panetta. This Director of Central Intelligence, who controls the White House, was reported to the Editor of this service to be STILL blocking the Settlements as of 5th March 2010.
But even as we were being told this, something interesting happened behind the scenes. Which brings us to the real nub of the matter.
‘WALKING IN A STRAIGHT LINE’ WILL EXPOSE THE DECEPTIONS
The struggle that has been raging behind these scenes within and close to the DC Beltway reflects:
•A corrupt and criminal official determination to frustrate the Bank for International Settlements’ instructions (‘Line Item’) designating the conduct of the necessary and overdue G-7-approved on-balance sheet, fully taxable and transparent PRIVATE SECTOR Refunding of the US Dollar to Mr Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S., who, we were informed by US ‘inside’ sources (who will be exposed if this turns out to be false) is regarded by personnel working for The Queen as the only expert who can be trusted with this task.
•If none of this is true, the preceding report, containing a letter from Mr A. Clifton Hodges to the Editor of this service for onward delivery (which was implemented) to Buckingham Palace, was intended to expose the deception and those engaged perpetrating it (whose names we know, if they are so engaged, and who will be exposed along with the other deceivers, should a deception have been perpetrated. In accordance with our policy of ‘walking in a straight line’, we continue to assume that this is not the case: but we shall see).
•What certainly IS known is that the foregoing background has been used – in a similar manner as the Leo Wanta cover involving this Editor was exploited – to provide ‘smokescreen’ cover for an operation which might (in this context) supposedly enable the criminal perpetrators to conduct the Dollar Refunding themselves, for their own illicit profit, using FRNs, not US Treasury dollars.
In other words, the perpetrators have remained hell-bent on blocking the will of the international financial community as expressed via the BIS refunding ‘Line-Item’ instructions, given their horror at the prospect of losing control – and have illegally frustrated the intended use of the $6.2 trillion loan funds provided on 19th-20th July 2007 via the Bank of England under levy to six US money center banks, via the Bank of New York Mellon (as it became, effective July 2007).
COTTRELL THREATENS TO SNATCH AWAY THE RACKETEERS’ COVER,
THROWING THEM INTO A MAD PANIC. THIS WAS NOT ANTICIPATED.
On Friday 5th March, in telephone conversations, including one with the Editor of this service, attended by every despicable intelligence eavesdropper under the sun, Michael Cottrell stated unequivocally that if the $6.2 trillion refunding loan, as pre-agreed, is withheld from Mr Cottrell’s firm, Pennsylvania Investments Inc., he will walk away.
This statement evidently caused panic and a hurried strategic deception rethink inside the Beltway and in the other dark corners of the US criminal universe in question – more or less proving that, as with the Wanta operation which exploited both Mr Cottrell’s securities market expertise and this Editor’s publishing and publicity abilities and qualifications, the perpetrators had been using Mr Cottrell as cover for an intended deviation from the agreed-upon Basel instructions.
•The pending Pennsylvania Fraud exposure will PROVE THAT THIS ASSESSMENT IS CORRECT.
•The intention is for the proceeds of racketeering operations to be channelled inter alia into the hands of the partners of Deutsche AG, St Gallen, Switzerland.
And as indicated above, we know precisely who is behind this typical piece of CIA/DVD duplicity: and if it continues, they will be exposed by name. But, as always happens with these investigations, THIS OPERATION HAS ALREADY BEEN BLOWN. And it has been ‘blown’ because, whereas we have been walking ‘in a straight line’, the snakes are incapable of doing anything but slithering.
THE TWO MI-6 OPERATIVES WITH THE QUEEN'S SIGNATURE:
ARE THEY WORKING FOR, OR ARE THEY DOUBLE-CROSSING THE QUEEN?
It now has to be stated that if the two MI-6 operatives said to be carrying The Queen’s signature authority are or have been double-crossing Her Majesty, we will get to the bottom of that, as well, and will expose them, also. After all, we were able to expose the false assertion by the US ‘inside’ sources that Roy Grantham is a Representative of The Queen, when we asked Grantham to get in touch with us via this website. Although Grantham lives just a couple of miles from the Editor’s office, he saw fit to instruct a firm of ‘heavies’, based in Shreveport, LA, to issue a blatant threat by email against the Editor of this service.
•This ‘investigator’ said that Grantham would not be contacting the Editor of this service in view of his interest in preserving his ‘Stellar’ [note the geomasonic language] reputation.
Beyond this, it now has to be said that if the British Monarchical Power does not INSIST upon the agreed-upon Group of Seven-approved, private sector-based transparent, taxed Dollar Refunding operation proceeding precisely as specified by Basel, and is prepared to put up valuable assets in exchange for worthless Federal Reserve Notes, the Monarchy will self-destruct – WHICH IT IS THE OBJECTIVE OF THE PAN-GERMAN ENEMY TO PROCURE, since the British Monarchy stands in the way of the comprehensive realisation of Germany's insidious and now collapsing ‘Europe from the Atlantic to the Urals/Vladivostok’ hegemony plans.
WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THE CHINESE CURRENCY BOXES?
The same applies to the Chinese. What happened to the Chinese currency boxes which were made available SPECIFICALLY to provide backing for the Treasury dollar? Are the Chinese also stupidly risking their assets in exchange for worthless FRNs, as well – notwithstanding their knowledge that the US officials in charge are racketeers, and in spite of the still undischarged lien for $47 trillion against the US Treasury imposed on or about 6th December 2009?
GREEK DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER EQUATES NAZI GERMANY
WITH CHANCELLOR MERKEL’S STASI GERMANY
It is certainly true that the catastrophic (and soon to become even more catastrophic) European project is on the verge of self-destruction, too. In late February 2010, in an interview with the BBC, the Greek Deputy Prime Minister accused NAZI GERMANY – clearly eliding Nazi Germany with the current German STASI régime – of ‘taking away the gold that was in the Bank of Greece, and they never gave it back. They shouldn’t complain so much about stealing and not being very specific about [their] economic dealings’.
•In other words; WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT, FRAU MERKEL?
•The fact that Greece and Germany have since been in discussions, does NOT expunge the Greek Deputy Prime Minister's pointed observation from the record.
As previously reviewed, Greece’s massive toxic debt was accumulated under the preceding Greek Government as a consequence of Fraudulent Finance and racketeering operations with associates of the Bush/CIA/DVD Crime Syndicate via Citibank Athens, as we originally revealed a long time ago.
Far from being the weak partner, therefore, Greece is in fact in a position to DESTROY the entire poisonous pan-German hegemony operation, and in our opinion may well wind up doing so – as will similar situations waiting to explode among the PIGS (VIZ. Portugal, Italy (Greece) and Spain, which ought to read PIIGS, since Ireland is in the same position. A country with a huge trade surplus and a colossal current account deficit is in SERIOUS TROUBLE.
Uncoincidentally, each of these countries, as well as Iceland and the corrupted United Kingdom itself, has provided Fraudulent Finance ‘counterparty racketeering services’ to elements and associates of the Bush-CIA/DVD Crime Syndicate – with accruals doubtless pouring into Deutsche AG, St Gallen, for the benefit of Bush Senior, Gorbachëv (Orbach), Kohl and Ackermann.
WHAT DO THE FOUR RACKETEERS HAVE IN COMMON
WITH OTHER WELL-KNOWN DECEASED AND LIVING OPERATIVES?
What do these four racketeers have in common with the following deceased and living revolutionary operatives?
Andropov, Yuri (Lieberman)
Barroso, José Manuel
Biden, Joseph
Brown, Gordon
Bush Jr., George W.
Bush Sr., George H. W.
Clinton, Hillary Rodomski
Clinton, William Jefferson (Rockefeller)
Dodd, Senator Christopher
Emanuel, Rahm
Farage, Nigel
Geithner, Timothy
Grossart, Sir Angus
Khrushchev, Nikita (Perlmutter)
Medvedev (Menakhem Aaronovich Mendel)
Panetta, Leon
Paulson, Henry M.
Putin, Vladimir Vladimirovich (Shalomov)
Salmond, Alex
Sarkozy, Nicolas
Schickelgrüber, Adolf (Hitler)
Stalin, Josef (Djiugashvili-Kochba)?
FORECLOSURE ANALYSIS’ PARA-LEGAL SERVICES SPRINGING UP IN THE UNITED STATES
We turn now to the central issue: that securitisation is illegal under US law and indeed in all Common Law jurisdictions. There are NO REDEEMING FEATURES.
Services are now springing up in the United States providing a ‘Foreclosure Autopsy’ assessment in which breaks in the chain of title, missing assignments, unlawful substitution of trustees and blatant fraud and forgery, is typically identified. Such services do not provide actual legal advice: what they do is offer recorded information in support of any planned evidentiary hearing or legal discovery going all the way back to the original creditor/depositor. Every recorded document can be identified and surfaced for distressed homeowners – representing a broad foreclosure analysis resource support system via reliable established networks, local title companies, county recorders and other parties, especially in non-judicial foreclosure states like California, Arizona and Nevada, which appear to be states in the greatest need – given that it has been predicted that some 3.4 million foreclosures are anticipated across the United States over the rest of this calendar year (see Note 5 below for more background to this ‘utter corruption’).
NORTHERN ROCK’S LIES TO A FORMER MORTGAGOR MASKING
THE FACT THAT HER TITLE DEEDS WERE ‘OTHERWISE ENGAGED’
In Britain, we have been engaged with a householder who paid off her mortgage with Northern Rock in June 2004. In exchange, Northern Rock informed the lady that they would be forwarding her Title (Lease) documents, but failed to do so for five years – proffering every excuse under the sun for their gross failure, including the statement that her title documents had been ‘dematerialised’ – before, all of a sudden, forwarding her missing documents under cover of a letter saying that ‘it has come to our notice that we did not return your Title Documents in June 2004. Here they are. Please keep them in a safe place’.
•This occurred in June 2009, after the householder had torn her hair out, metaphorically speaking, for five long years trying to extract her documents from this reprobate lender.
In this instance, it is likely that, given that Northern Rock had had to be taken over by the British Government (since Gordon Brown was terrified at the media coverage of long lines of customers outside Northern Rock branches seeking to retrieve their savings, as in Argentina), the British Government’s lawyers may well have instructed Northern Rock to disgorge the said householder’s documents, which may have been encumbered by incorporation within a securitisation package.
The lady accepted a ‘compensation’ payment of £150 brokered by the Financial Ombudsman (which seems to exist to protect recalcitrant financial institutions operating within the British jurisdiction from determined ladies like this householder who will not take prevarication for an answer), on the basis of blatantly fraudulent information (e.g. that her title documents had been ‘dematerialised’ – a false statement placed in writing by Northern Rock).
We have comprehensively deconstructed this Northern Rock case, with facsimiles of the relevant correspondence, in the forthcoming huge issue of International Currency Review (6), indicating that Northern Rock lied to the householder, who was accordingly subjected to five years of anxiety and was unable to exercise her right to move home at any time during those five years.
•UPDATE: The householder wrote many days ago to Northern Rock asking them to answer her question, YES or NO: were her Title Deeds assigned and incorporated in a securitisation package without her permission? As of this date [11th March], THERE HAS BEEN NO RESPONSE. This is because they can't answer the question without re-incriminating themselves. They have lied in writing already, so they have a major problem: as does the British Government, as the bank is controlled by the Government. We'll see where the serpents in question slither and writhe to.
•MORTGAGE DECEPTION IN SPAIN: This morning [11th March], we received an email from a UK correspondent who writes: 'I have a house in Spain, with a mortgage attached to it from Banco do Valencia'. Three years ago, the lady in question sought specific answers to her questions about prospective changes to the conditions of the mortgage. The bank failed to respond at all.
Moreover even after she complained to the bank's Head Offfice, enclosing all the correspondence, there was no reply. Some time later the bank branch manager admitted to the lady that the changes that she requested could not be implemented BECAUSE THE MORTGAGE HAD BEEN 'SOLD' ON TO ANOTHER COMPANY. But of course the Spanish bank refused to provide any details of the company in question, let alone guidance on how they could be contacted. This revealed that, as in the cited Northern Rock case, Banco do Valencia are hiding something.
Our correspondent states: 'So I pay my monthly mortgage to Banco do Valencia without having a clue who really owns that debt or who I am ultimately paying. This chimes with your Northern Rock exposure. Keep up the good work'.
•Two points: (1): NEVER DO BUSINESS IN SPAIN. They will always deceive and double-cross you. And: (2): The fact that Britain and Spain are satrap states caught in the European Union Collective entrapment net MAKES NO DIFFERENCE. Sheisters are sheisters, no matter what the regime.
•AND A VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE PROFESSIONAL UK CORRESPONDENT ADDS [11th March]:
'From my own experience of finance companies' 'lawlessness', they never back down even when shown that their actions are illegal or contracts unenforceable; and the standard ploy is not to answer letters... In psychological terms, this shows that they are extremely afraid, beneath the superficial impression of arrogance that they display. Their power, therefore, is an illusion'.
•Editor's add-on: With the Northern Rock test case, we can assure you that there will be no let-up as they have been caught lying to the former mortgagor IN WRITING and there's not a lot they can do to retrieve their situation. No doubt the Government's lawyers will be forced to intervene.
SECURITISATION IS A KEY ELEMENT OF A REVOLUTIONARY ATTACK ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
When you consider that, as will now be rehearsed, securitisation is completely illegal under US and Common Law, you can see not only that these criminal enterprise financial institutions are well and truly on the wrack, but also WHY there has been such intense and ruthless ongoing RESISTANCE to the exposure of this rampant dirty racketeering activity – which represents nothing less than an intentional, sustained and suitably ‘below the radar’ offensive by the manipulators of the World Revolution against private property – being micromanaged in parallel with the so-called ‘sexual revolution’ and ‘upside down’ outpouring of every form of reprobate behaviour and perverted sex which is aimed at destroying the family, regarded by these long-range geomasonic maniacs as the glue which ‘legitimises’ private property.
Even if a jaded observer has zero knowledge of the progress of the World Revolution, which has reached an advanced (and yet fragile) stage in our era, the relentlessly comprehensive spread and coverage of the racketeering and corruption being perpetrated against private home owners can easily be seen to be ‘no accident’. As with ALL dimensions of the World Revolution, one has to ask oneself: how come that this nefarious, barbaric behaviour appeared suddenly and on such a truly colossal scale in every corner of the world almost simultaneously? None of this is coincidental: people who treat such developments as ‘phenomena’ without enquiring WHY these things are happening, are destined to languish in permanent ignorance of the truth.
YES, A RUTHLESS, SYSTEMATIC ATTACK ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
And the truth IS that what we are exposing is nothing less than a carefully planned, ruthless, determined and systematic revolutionary attack on private property.
•No wonder Gorbachëv sits, to this day, in a huge wing of the Kremlin, as before.
HE COLLABORATED WITH BUSH SENIOR to unleash this scourge on homeowners in the United States, Britain and the White Commonwealth countries – the ‘Main Enemy’, in collaboration with the covert Soviets’ intelligence allies, German ‘Black’ intelligence (DVD, DACHAU), hiding behind the front conveniently provided by the duplicitous French under the Treaty of the Elysée.
The criminal mentality seeks at all costs to entangle its targets in its own corruption, so that if anything goes wrong, the targeted parties are readily identifiable as racketeers, thereby providing the originating perpetrators with cover (so they imagine).
Hence the subversion through corruption of foreign counterparties – in Britain, Iceland, Greece, Italy, the Vatican, Spain, Portugal, Albania, North Korea, India, China, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Cyprus and wherever willing trading counterparties may be found.
LOWEST COMMON DENOMINATOR SCAMS STILL ‘OUT THERE’
That such Fraudulent Finance operations have continued as though there had been no historical discontinuity is of course well known. But a good deal of ‘scraping of the barrel’ is also taking place. Last year we drew attention to certain curious money-lending activities that were being fronted or sponsored by Newsmax.com which we were advised may be borderline financial scams.
The lowest racketeering common denominator we have ever come across, dated 2nd March 2010, from Cyprus – signed off by one Mr Ahmet Z. Altunis, ‘Principal Right Holder. World Wide Funding Trust’ seeks clients inter alia in the United States, to take advantage of their services for all ‘your unconventional funding needs’:
‘We give big opportunity to enter trade (PPP). If your assets SKRs (Safe-Keeping Receipts), Notes, Lease MTNS, Bond(s), IBOS, CMOS, have no available credit line now, we open credit line to your name. You can enter (PPP), your big profit [to] finance your project. We begin New Year contracts 2010: Enter Gateway to unlimited opportunities…. Send LOI + CIS + SKR + Passport. Then we open and activate credit line under YOUR NAME, even [though] the credit line is open on our name… Client have NO RISKS at 100%, all is secured by our and their lawyers, no tricks’.
When this crude solicitation written in barbaric English was sent to us from the United States, we were told that it represents a lowest common denominator fraud serving the Bush Crime Syndicate network. In due course, the client is asked for an up-front fee of between 12,800 and 15,000 Euros to cover ‘due diligence costs’, so it looks like a standard ‘Nigerian-type’ scam: but it isn’t.
Targets are being enticed into securitisation deals, which are illegal as indicated below, under US and Common Law. The solicitation sent to us (above) was being widely disseminated within the United States by US parties (wire fraud).
WHY SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL UNDER U.S. AND COMMON LAW
Securitisation is illegal under US legislation – primarily because it is fraudulent and causes specific violations of R.I.C.O., usury, Antitrust and bankruptcy laws. And it flies in the face of public policy in numerous ways, as is expounded in extensive detail in an analysis to be published in our journalEconomic Intelligence Review 2009Q1 (7) with several pages of book, article and case references.
To begin with, securitisation violates US State usury legislation. Secondly, all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ as well as ‘assignment’ securitisations are essentially tax evasion schemes, and the penalties for tax evasion in the United States are excessively severe.
Thirdly, in all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations, the conflict of interest inherent in the sponsor also serving as the servicer constitutes fraud and conversion. In the fourth place, in all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations where the Special Purpose Vehicle [SPV] is a trust, the declaration of trust is void, as it exists for an illegal purpose.
In the fifth place, off-balance sheet treatment of asset-backed securities (both for ‘true-sale’ and for assignment transactions) constitutes fraud.
Sixth, all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations involve blatant fraudulent conveyances. In the seventh place, securitisation usurps United States bankruptcy laws and is accordingly illegal, as well as being also demonstrably contrary to public policy.
SECURITISATION ENTAILS GROSS VIOLATIONS OF R.I.C.O. STATUTES
In ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations, there are fraudulent transactions which serve as ‘predicate acts’ under US Federal R.I.C.O. statutes.
The specific R.I.C.O. sections are: Section 1341 (mail fraud); Section 1343 (wire fraud); Section 1344 (financial institution fraud); Section 1957 (engaging in monetary transactions improperly derived from specified unlawful activity) [‘the money you make from the illegal exploitation of my money, is my money’]; and Section 1952 (racketeering).
Furthermore, securitisation constitutes violations of American antitrust statutes through market integration, syndicate collusion, price formation, vertical foreclosure, tying, price-fixing, predatory pricing, and the rigging of allocations.
Securitisation also involves void contracts, given the lack of consideration, illusory promises, the absence of any actual bargain, the absence of mutuality – and finally illegal subject matter and the contravention of public policy.
Securitisation is riddled with Fraudulent Transfer, Fraud in the Inducement, Fraud in Fact by Deceit, Theft by Deception (Fraudulent Concealment) and Fraudulent Conveyance: see the US securities regulations routinely breached in such activity, listed at the foot of this report and of most of these reports for THE PAST THREE YEARS, and other laws also routinely flouted in this context.
NOTWITHSTANDING THAT IT’S ILLEGAL, U.S. AUTHORITIES
CONTINUE TO PROMOTE AND ENCOURAGE SECURITISATION
Yet notwithstanding such crystal-clear indications that securitisation is 100% ILLEGAL under US Law, as well as under Common Law generally (so that these findings are largely applicable in all Common Law countries), US authorities from the highest level downwards, financial institutions, intermediaries, Intelligence Power operatives and others are gearing up for what they doubtless hope will be intensified racketeering and trading activity with (corrupt) foreign counterparties.
This behaviour is being fine-tuned ‘as we speak’, despite the reality that the securitisation activity being planned and implemented violates innumerable US statutes in the manner we summarise above, and notwithstanding that such activity is contrary to public policy.
Indeed, it’s as though the Rule of Law did not exist. From the highest level of the US Treasury, the White House, the US State Department and the Central Intelligence Agency and its subsidiaries such as the lethal Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), the mindset, intention and perverse primary objective has all along been to resume Fraudulent Finance based on securitisation, as quickly and as seamlessly as possible. No wonder the five criminal Presidents DEMANDED immunity from prosecution from the World Court: did they arrange for key Justices (starting with the American Justice) at the World Court to receive pecuniary reward for granting them their demand?
SUMMARY FORENSIC ANALYSIS PROVING THE ILLEGALITY OF SECURITISATION
From whichever angle securitisation is considered, it is ILLEGAL. For example, the contracts are themselves VOID. This is because the process of securitisation involves several contracts that are either signed simultaneously, or within a short timeframe – many of which are rendered void inter alia because there is no consideration in contracts used in effecting the securitisations.
Many such contracts involve unilateral executory undertakings containing illusory promises. A unilateral executory promise is not a consideration. Such promises typically include a promise made by the Special Purpose Vehicle to pay out periodic interest, whether contingent or non-contingent on whether the collateral pays cash interest.
Collateral-substitution agreements contain a promise whereby the sponsor agrees to substitute impaired collateral. An assignment agreement of future (not yet existing) collateral may well be deemed a unilateral executory promise by the sponsor.
Illusory promises are not valid consideration for a contract. Such promises may be found in the Subscription/Purchase Agreement, whereby an existing asset is being exchanged for a future asset that does not exist as of the date of the subscription/purchase agreement. To make matters worse, none of the agreements typically signed by the investor as part of his/her purchase of the Special Purpose Vehicle’s Asset-Backed Securities expressly incorporates the (typically illusory) promises embodied in the offering prospectus.
OR: The Special Purpose Vehicle’s promise to pay interest and/or dividends on Asset-Backed Securities ‘Interest-Onlys’, Preferreds and ‘Pincipal-Onlys’ are essentially illusory promises because the underlying collateral may not produce any cash flows at all: so there won’t be any interest/dividend payments.
Moreover the lack of mutuality characterising such contracts renders them null and void, by definition. In any such contract, each party must have firm control of the subject matter of the contract and the underlying assets (consideration), and there MUST be a direct contractual relationship between the parties concerned.
But this is not the case, especially as the Special Purpose Vehicle’s corporate documents (trust indentures or bylaws or articles of incorporation) may typically limit the right of each Asset-Back Security investor; while there is typically no mutuality at all between the Special Purpose Vehicle and the sponsor/originator, because both entities are essentially the same, and are controlled by the sponsor before and after the securitisation takes place.
SECURITISATION: A COVER FOR TAX EVASION
In addition to their multiple violations of American State usury laws, all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment securitisations’ are essentially tax evasion arrangements. In the United States, the applicable tax evasion statute is the US Internal Revenue Code Section 7201 7 which reads: “Any person who willfully attempts in any manner to evade or defeat any tax imposed by this title or the payment thereof shall, in addition to other penalties provided by law, be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $100,000 ($500,000 in the case of a corporation), or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution”.
Under this statute and related case law, prosecutors must prove three elements beyond any reasonable doubt:
(1): The actus reus (the guilty conduct) – which consists of an affirmative act (not merely an omission or failure to act) that constitutes evasion or an attempt to evade either: (a) the assessment of a tax or (b) the payment of a tax.
(2): The mens rea or “mental” element of willfulness – the specific intent to violate an actually known legal duty. In the case of ‘true sale’ transactions, the tax evasion occurs because:
(a): The sponsor determines the price at which the collateral is transferred to the SPV, and hence, can arbitrarily lower/increase the price to avoid capital gains taxes – it being assumed here that the sponsor is a profit-maximising entity and will always act to minimise its tax liability and to avoid any tax assessment;
(b): The sponsor typically retains a ‘residual’ interest in the SPV in the form of IOs, POs and “junior piece”, which are typically taxed differently and on a different tax-basis compared with the original collateral: hence, the sponsor can lower the price of the collateral upon transfer to the SPV, and convert what would have been capital gains, into a non-taxable basis in the SPV “residual”;
(c): There is typically the requisite “intent” by the sponsor – evidenced by the arrangement of the transaction and the transfer of assets to the Special Purpose Vehicle;
(d): Before securitisation, collateral is typically reported in the sponsors’ financial statements at book value (that is, lower-of-cost-or-market: under both the US and the international accounting standards, loans and accounts receivable are typically not re-valued to market-value unless there has been some major impairment in value) which does not reflect true Market Values, and results in effective tax evasion on transfer of the collateral to the SPV, as any unrealised gain is not taxed;
(e): The actus reus is manifested by the execution of the securitisation transaction and transfer of assets to the SPV;
(f): The mens rea or specific intent is manifested by the elaborate arrangements implicit in securitisation transactions, the method of determination of the price of the collateral to be transferred to the SPV, the aims of securitisation, and the sponsor’s transfer of assets to the SPV;
(g): The unpaid tax liability consists of foregone tax on the capital gains from the collateral (the transaction is structured to avoid recognition of capital gains), and tax on any income from the collateral which is ‘converted’ into basis or other non-taxable forms;
(h): Income (from the collateral) that would have been taxable in the sponsor’s own financial statements, is converted into non-taxable basis in the form of the SPV’s Interest-Only (IO) and Principal-Only (PO) securities: part of the Interest-Spread (the difference between the SPV’s income and what it pays as interest and operating costs) is paid out to PO-holders, and this transforms interest into return-of-capital or just capital repayment, with no tax consequences. [Leaving aside the Ponzi scam dimension here – Ed.].
In cases of ‘disguised loan’ or ‘assignment’ securitisation transactions, tax evasion occurs:
(a): Because the sponsor determines the price at which the collateral is transferred to the SPV, and hence can lower/increase the price of the collateral to avoid capital gains taxes;
(b): Because the sponsor typically retains a ‘residual’ interest in the SPV which is normally taxed differently and on a different tax-basis compared to the original collateral: hence, the sponsor can lower the price upon transfer to the SPV, and convert what would have been capital gains, into non-taxable basis for tax purposes;
(c): Because the transfer of collateral to the SPV and the creation of Interest-Only and Principal-Only securities converts what would have been taxable capital gains into non-taxable basis;
(d): Because gain in the value of the collateral is not recognised for tax purposes, because there has not been any ‘sale’;
(e): Where the ABS is partly amortising, any capital gains are converted into interest payments;
(f): Because actus reus is manifested by the execution of the securitisation transaction and transfer of assets to the SPV;
(g): Because the mens rea or specific intent is manifested by the elaborate arrangements implicit in securitisation transactions, the objectives of securitisation and the sponsor’s transfer of assets to the Special Purpose Vehicle;
(h): Because the unpaid tax liability consists of tax on the capital gains from the transfer of the collateral (the transaction is structured to avoid recognition of a sale, whereas the transfer to the Special Purpose Vehicle is effectively a sale), and tax on any income from the collateral which is ‘converted’ into basis or other non-taxable forms, by securitisation.
SECURITISATION VIOLATES THE U.S BANKRUPTCY CODE
AND THEREFORE ALSO CONTRAVENES PUBLIC POLICY
Any transfer or conveyance of the assets of a debtor that is deemed to be made for the purposes of hindering, delaying or defrauding actual or potential creditors, may be determined by Courts to be a Fraudulent Conveyance under Section 548 of the US Bankruptcy Code or under a relevant theory of Constructive Fraud.
Although each US State has its own laws regarding the appropriate elements of proof of Constructive Fraud, Section 548(a)(2) of the US Bankruptcy Code permits an inference of Constructive Fraud if the following factors exist:
(1): The debtor received less than reasonably equivalent value for the property transferred; and:
(2): The debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the transfer, or else retained unreasonably small capital after the transfer, or made the transfer with the intent or belief that it would incur debts beyond its ability to pay.
The following theories of Fraudulent Conveyance within the context of securitisation may apply:
•Where the sponsor/originator receives insufficient value for assets transferred.
•Where there is an ‘intent to hinder, delay or defraud’ creditors (representing an implicit pre-petition waiver of one’s right to file for bankruptcy), with regard to the originator’s transfer of assets to the SPV, or the originator’s transfer of assets to the SPV has clearly not been undertaken on an arms’-length basis.
•Where securitisation increases the originator’s bankruptcy risk; and:
•In all instances where securitisation usurps the United States' bankruptcy laws and is therefore illegal on such a basis alone.
SECURITISATION VIOLATES FEDERAL R.I.C.O. STATUTES
Turning now to the reality that securitisation constitutes a violation of US Federal R.I.C.O. Statutes [see Legal Notes below], we can state without equivocation that the entire securitisation process constitutes violations of Federal R.I.C.O. statutes, because:
(1): There is the requisite criminal or civil ‘enterprise’ – consisting of the sponsor/issuer, the trustees and the intermediary bank. These three parties work closely together to effect the securitisation transaction.
(2): There are ‘predicate acts’ of:
(a): Mail fraud – using the mails for sending out materials among themselves and to investors.
(b): Wire fraud – using wires to engage in fraud by communicating with investors.
( c): Conversion – where there isn’t proper title to collateral.
(d): Deceit: misrepresentation of issues and facts pertaining to the securitisation transaction.
(e): Securities fraud: disclosure issues.
(f): It entails loss of profit opportunity.
(g): It involves the making of false statements and or misleading representations
about the value of the collateral.
(h): It entails stripping the originator/issuer of the ability to pay debt claims or judgment claims in bankruptcy court – a state of affairs that may apply where the sponsor is financially distressed and the cash proceeds of the transaction are significantly less than the value of the collateral.
There is also typically the requisite ‘intent’ by members of the enterprise – evident in knowledge (actual and inferable), acts, omissions, purpose (actual and inferable) and results. Intent can be reasonably inferred from:
(a): The existence of a sponsor that seeks to raise capital – and cannot raise capital on better terms by other means;
(b): The participation of an investment bank that has very strong incentives to consummate the transaction on any agreeable (but not necessarily reasonable) terms.
SECURITISATION ALSO VIOLATES U.S. ANTITRUST LEGISLATION
Securitisation further constitutes violations of US Antitrust laws, because the American Asset-Backed Securities and Mortgage-Backed Securities markets are dominated by relatively few large entities such as FNMA (Fannie Mae), Freddie Mac, the top five investment banks (all of which have conduit programs), and the top five credit card issuers (MBNA, AMEX, Citigroup, etc.), etc.. As a consequence, the top five ABS/MBS issuers control more than 50% of the US ABS/MBS market. This constitutes illegal market concentration under US Antitrust legislation.
THE ‘PHILIPPINES EXCEPTION’ BURIED IN THE CLAYTON ACT
In the Antitrust context, however, observe the following text from the Clayton Act, which specifically EXCLUDES transactions undertaken with The Philippines. Isn’t that interesting?
It provides a blanket rationale for the massive past and ongoing US clandestine focus on The Philippines, the CIA’s need for ‘black hole’ conditions there in connection with successive US operations to relieve Presidents Marcos and Aquino of the stolen and hidden ‘Yamashita’s gold’, the US Fraudulent Finance operations using Philippine institutions and related operations based in that territory, an aborted US operation to convert The Philippines into a new US State (as had been planned under Clinton for Somalia), and the frequent visits of operatives known to ourselves to The Philippines under cover of attending to ‘orphanages’:
§ 1 Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 12 Definitions; short title:
(a) “Antitrust laws”, as used herein, includes the Act entitled:
‘An Act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies’, approved July second, eighteen hundred and ninety; sections seventy-three to seventy-seven, inclusive, of an Act entitled ‘An Act to reduce taxation, to provide revenue for the Government, and for other purposes’, of August 27th, eighteen hundred and ninety-four; an Act entitled ‘An Act to amend sections seventy-three and seventy-six of the Act of August twenty-seventh, eighteen hundred and ninetyfour’, entitled ‘An Act to reduce taxation, to provide revenue for the Government, and for other purposes’, approved February twelfth, nineteen hundred and thirteen; and also this Act.
‘Commerce’, as used herein, means trade or commerce among the several States and with foreign nations, or between the District of Columbia or any Territory of the United States and any State, Territory, or foreign nation, or between any insular possessions or other places that are under the jurisdiction of the United States, or between any such possession or place and any US State or Territory of the United States or the District of Columbia or any foreign nation, or within the District of Columbia or any Territory or any insular possession or other place under the jurisdiction of the United States:
Provided, That nothing in this Act contained shall apply to the Philippine Islands. The word ‘person’ or ‘persons’ wherever used in this Act shall be deemed to include corporations and associations existing under or authorized by the laws of either the United States, the laws of any of the Territories, the laws of any State, or the laws of any foreign country.
FANNIE MAE, FREDDIE MAC ENGAGED IN FURTHER ILLEGAL SECURITISATION:
RE-SECURITISING ALREADY SECURITISED ‘DUD’ ASSETS TO DUMP BACK ON THE BANKS
Even so, it became apparent in early March that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, both controlled by the US Government, are preparing to force financial enterprises such as the CIA’s Bank of America Corporation, JP Morgan Chase & Co, Wells Fargo and Citigroup, Inc., to buy back further waves of newly securitised packages of mortgages – i.e., the former Government-Sponsored Enterprises are reportedly engaged again in repackaging mortgage securities already marked down to ‘true’ value.
In other words, they are trying to dump faulty securitised loans, as well as straight loans, back on the participating banks – under cover of such fantasies as the double-minded statement attributed to Sharon McHale, spokes‘person’ for Freddie Mac, located adjacent to the CIA in McLean, Virginia, on 5th March 2010: ‘We are trying to be good stewards of taxpayer dollars and as part of that, it’s important that those dollars not go to loans that should not have been sold to us in the first place’ – throwing the blame for Freddie Mac’s own scandalous racketeering behaviour back at the banks.
•Being interpreted, what this woman was saying was: this:
‘We are covering ourselves with a mantle of rectitude by posing as protectors of the taxpayer’s dollars in order to obfuscate our own ongoing racketeering behaviour, even as we prepare further Fraudulent Finance securitisations in violation of the relevant US legislation: and we couldn’t care less because we are owned by the Government itself, which is up to its neck in such violations'.
And Paul Miller, a former examiner for the Federal Reserve (hardly a guarantee of integrity, given the Fed’s own reputation for Fraudulent Finance), based in Arlington, VA, let the cat out of the bag with: ‘If you want to originate mortgages and keep that pipeline running, you have to deal with the push-backs. It doesn’t matter how much you hate Fannie and Freddie’ – and neither, apparently, does it matter to what extent the Rule of Law is cynically violated ‘in order to keep the pipeline (of Fraudulent Finance) running’.
GARY GENSLER IS NOT AS OPPOSED TO FRAUDULENT FINANCE AS HE SEEMS
The appointment of Gary Gensler as Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission under President Obama was greeted with signs of relief on Wall Street. Here was a hardened former Goldman Sachs trader with 18 years’ experience with that cynical, ruthless money shop, who could be relied upon to act at all times in the interests of Wall Street, not the investor and taxpayer.
But, as has since been reported elsewhere, over a private lunch at the Waldorf Astoria in midtown Manhattan on 6th January 2010, the 52-year-old Gary Gensler caused indigestion among the self-satisfied guests at the luncheon – Timothy O’Hara, head of global credit at Crédit Suisse Holdings USA, Inc.; Robert P. Kelly, CEO at Bank of New York Mellon Corporation; David B. Heller, co-head of the securities division at Goldman Sachs; and Seth Waugh, CEO of Deutsche Bank Americas.
Because when one banker asked Gensler what or whom he saw as the biggest obstacles to reform in the securities and commodities sectors, he replied: ‘You’ (8).
Mr Gensler has been seeking derivatives control legislation that goes beyond current proposals, including what President Obama put forward during the summer of 2009. Notwithstanding the fact that if the derivatives situation is not addressed, the forthcoming crash will be so horrific as to be likely to tip the world into open, rather than covert, warfare, a certain Samuel Hayes, Professor Emeritus of Investment Banking at Harvard Business School, Boston, told Bloomberg in February 2010 that ‘Gensler is going to raise real concerns’ for financial firms.
‘Derivatives are absolutely central to what is Wall Street in the 21st century’ – namely, a casino. ‘Nobody wants the regulations to affect them’ (9).
‘GREATER TRANSPARENCY’ IS EVIDENTLY ALL HE‘S AFTER
On closer examination, Mr Gensler has actually been pushing for ‘more transparency’ in the over-the-counter derivatives market, so as to lower spreads between buyers and sellers and to make it easier for new competitors to enter the market – which the big banks aren’t keen on, as more participants will deprive them of profit.
So, Gary Gensler is not actually in the business of tackling the underlying crisis arising from the determination of financial institutions to continue playing Russian roulette, using the model first developed by the US Intelligence Power as it sought what it thought were foolproof methods of ensuring its financial independence from Congress and the open-ended funding pipelines that it considered appropriate to buttress its usurped status as a recalcitrant ‘State within the State’ impervious to reform and determined to brook no interference with its stolen hegemony.
INVESTORS’ MONEY USED TO REMUNERATE WALL STREET
In any case, the derivatives institutions and their back-up infrastructure have not the slightest intention of adopting any course other than ’business as usual‘ – and on a far larger scale than in the past. This obtuse madness WILL lead to a global collapse, as derivatives products are usually without real value. As a noted article in The New York Times of 7th February 2010 at last stated, investment banks trading derivatives do not own the mortgage bonds, the obligations from home owners, notes signed by home owners or the mortgage deeds of the deeds of trust.
The ‘structured products’, consisting of bundled documents ostensibly relating to the above but having NO RECOURSE to underlying real value, were, however, invested with ‘value’ arising from the name of the institution marketing the ‘asset’ – that is to say, arbitrary 'value' arising from the fact that, as a Goldman Sachs compliance officer actually admitted to the Editor of this service: ‘A structured product is worth what someone is prepared to pay for it’ – a penetrating statement which encapsulates the possibility that it may be (is) worthless: which is indeed the case.
‘THE MONEY YOU MAKE BY MISUSING MY MONEY IS MY MONEY’ – I.E., THE HOME OWNER’S
The money sloshing around between investment banks in this dirty market was investors' money unwittingly advanced into pools of capital which winds up being used primarily to finance the fees, profits, insurance proceeds, insurance premia, and so forth – all for the benefit of Wall Street, paid to the investment banks, and not to investors who stumped up the money in the first place.
These fees and relationships are not and have never been disclosed to the home owner despite, in the United States, clear legislation requiring such transparency, including the Truth in Lending Act, and Deceptive Lending – which require full transparency and disclosure.
•Further legislation applicable to the securities sector in the United States is re-listed below – in the list that we have republished at the foot of our website reports for the past three years.
•The list of applicable securities regulations and laws is augmented by a legal tutorial which, again, we have published for the past three years at the foot of these reports,
It would appear that, notwithstanding such reminders, Wall Street and its compliant infrastructure, as well as its co-conspiring portfolio of dubious foreign trading counterparty institutions, has every intention of continuing to violate the relevant US rules and legislation – while at the same time continuing to abuse, in the mortgage sector, the home owner with the same cynicism as in the past.
Given the legal principle that ‘the money you make from misusing my money is my money’, it is quite clear that undisclosed fees, profits, kickbacks and other financial abuses perpetrated by these big speculative financial entities which produce no real wealth at all, but simply move money around between themselves, are payable to the home owner who signed the ‘loan’ papers in the first place.
A PERVERSE AND ARROGANT OFFICIAL INTENT TO CONTINUE VIOLATING U.S. LAW
But none of these realities – which have been rammed home by the technical work that we have published on this subject in International Currency Review, prepared by Michael C. Cottrell, B.A., M.S. – have had any impact so far on the thinking of derivatives sector participants, analysts and observers, who appear to be hell-bent on continuing to violate US legislation.
On the contrary, these people are concerned exclusively with ensuring that the discontinuity that enveloped their sector and the financial markets as a whole in mid-September 2008 – is reversed, even though a total resumption of derivatives trading at full throttle WILL lead the world, and all engaged in this fraudulent activity, into a black hole
Moreover, since cracks are appearing in the entire structure of sophisticated finance ‘as we speak’, centred on Greece – the previous Government of which incurred, through Fraudulent Finance operations using Citibank, Athens, as counterparty to Bush/Cheney trading activities, an immense portfolio of derivatives obligations estimated at 300 billion Euros off-balance sheet, which can never be honoured – the timing of the collapse need no longer be measured in years.
So the self-centred, myopic speculative institutions are behaving like gun-toting bandits in a department store – determined to have their own way, irrespective of the consequences: one of which is that in the event of default, colossal payouts are due on Credit Default Swap contracts, which in fact amounts to institutionalised blackmail.
THE DEPOSITORY TRUST & CLEARING CORPORATION IS IN OVERDRIVE
For its part, the main component of the derivatives infrastructure supporting this prospectively catastrophic speculative activity is the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) – best known for its Cede & Co. partnership nominee facility, which is the holder of almost every physical stock certificate in existence, and boasts of accounting for more than $2.0 quadrillion in (largely fake) securities transactions annually.
On 10th February 2010, the DTCC announced that the Federal Reserve Board had approved its application to establish a DTCC subsidiary which is to be a member of the Federal Reserve System to operate ‘the Trade Information Warehouse (Warehouse) for over-the-counter (OTC) credit derivatives and the ‘legally accepted’ global depository for over-the-counter credit derivatives transactions'. (10).
THE FEDERAL RESERVE HAS BECOME
THE BACK-STOP GUARANTOR OF CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS
Which means, in practice, that the Federal Reserve is now the GUARANTOR behind all Credit Default Swap (CDS) transactions that clear via DTCC. The new Fed-endorsed organisation will settle CDS obligations in all currencies and process credit events. It will also handle all over-the-counter credit derivatives traded worldwide, will be regulated by the Federal Reserve and the New York State Banking Department, as well as being ‘overseen’ by other American as well as international regulators (via a sort of college of supervisors).
The DTCC’s Trade Information Warehouse will be operated by a Warehouse Trust, beginning its operations ‘once certain organizational conditions have been met, which are expected shortly’. It is understood that the company will have been funded and will have started operations by March.
One observer, commenting on these arrangements, wrote to say: ‘To be sure, the net notional CDS amount, which is what counterparties would be on the hook for in the case of an orderly unwind of the financial system, is materially lower than the gross total. Yet, as systemic unwinds are never orderly, gross tends to become net – as for instance when Lehman bonds went from par to 10 cents in the space of 24 hours. Should systemic risk flare up again’ (think Greece – Ed.), ’and fiat-based market values quickly catch up with ‘fair values’ – which in our Ponzi economy can very easily be calculated: they are ALL ZERO – the Federal Reserve will be on the hook’, with the US taxpayer, for amounts so large that the volume of printed money will reduce the value of a dollar to one cent or less within the space of a few weeks (or less).
So basis spreads can be expected to be severely compressed, once counterparty risk has become a thing of the past and all systemic risk in the biggest derivatives marketplace (excluding interest rate swaps) is fully backstopped (in theory) by the Federal Reserve.
In addition, the DTCC will be guaranteed monopoly status with respect to Credit Default Swap trading, as no-one in this business will wish to transact or clear anywhere else.
•FACT: Monopolies are illegal under US, British and European law.
STAGE SET FOR AN UNIMAGINABLE (AVOIDABLE)
CATASTROPHE: A DEATH-WISH
So the stage is well and truly set for a catastrophe of unimaginable proportions, bearing in mind that under Geithner as President, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York alone accumulated a portfolio of derivatives ‘assets’ commonly cited at $500 trillion, but which is probably much larger. This of course makes a complete nonsense of the formal derivatives data published by the Bank for International Settlements, which excludes double-counting; but none of these numbers can be relied upon, although the Bank for International Settlements' information possesses the cachet of authority and has to be used for want of better data (11).
The DTCC is also boasting of further innovations, including the expansion of its Global Corporate Actions (GCA) service based on feedback, sourcing scheduled payment announcements from the Federal Reserve Board for US structured and non-structured securities, specifically Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac securities, which are not DTC-eligible; scheduled payments coverage to include international securities that are not DTC-eligible; and distribution information on UK Unit Trusts.
THE DTCC'S OBLIGATIONS WAREHOUSE SERVICE
The January 2010 issue of DTCC News and Information for DTCC customers further discusses how the DTCC’s Obligations Warehouse, to be launched by mid-2010, will quote 'provide transparency for the industry and regulators while delivering operational efficiencies, cost savings and risk mitigation to financial firms'. The new service will ‘close the chapter on the manual processing of ex-clearing trades by empowering ops. professionals with a real-time automated service that will electronically manage these transactions and communicate a match to each side of the obligation’.
‘The Obligation Warehouse service will also automate the management of non-Continuous Net Settlement (CNS) fails. ’Because these trades exist outside Continuous Net Settlement, the back office faces an accounting nightmare in handling these transactions – not to mention bearing the added costs for maintaining comprehensive records and dedicated personnel to keep track of their status. The Obligation Warehouse will help mitigate this risk by consolidating all ex-clearing and non-CNS fails in a central location and storing them until settlement’.
‘The Obligation Warehouse enhances transparency by fully capturing, for the first time ever, all trading activity in NSCC-eligible securities in a central location from trade date until settlement. As a result, ex-clearing trades will no longer be invisible to all but the direct parties to that particular transaction. Instead, the industry and regulators will have a complete view of all open obligations traded in the US marketplace for equities, corporates, municipals and also unit trust investment securities – and [will] have a central vantage point to monitor and mitigate systemic risk’ (12).
GREATER TRANSPARENCY WON’T ELIMINATE SYSTEMIC RISK,
OR PREVENT A CONFIDENCE CRISIS
But while being able to see systemic risk stresses emerging may be an advantage, it won’t, and cannot, eliminate systemic risk. This is because these trades are fraudulent given the fact that securitisation violates US law (and Common Law in English-speaking countries), while in most contexts anyway, they are bedevilled by a lack of real value and non-recourse characteristics.
As for Credit Default Swaps, whatever the contract provides and whenever the counterparties decide on the basis of the contract that a default has taken place or is about to take place, it is in the interests of the provider to allow the default to take place, given the huge payouts which ensue. In other words, the contract is based on latent blackmail. That alone makes it illegal.
SO, WHERE ARE YOU, MR HOLDER?
Much more seriously, as summarised above, securitisation contracts are ALL ILLEGAL under US and Common Law. Therefore, all US official and ‘private’ sector operations being framed so as to revalidate and rehabilitate securitisation represent a perverse assault on the Rule of Law, and the commission of multiple felonies – accordingly leaving ALL perpetrators, whether holders of public office under the United States or any other level of government or employed by wayard financial institutions, or developing the securitisation infrastructure, vulnerable to criminal investigation, indictment, arrest and prosecution for gross and knowing violations of the law.
Whether the scandalous immunity from prosecution awarded by the World Court on demand to the five self-acknowledged criminal US Presidents protects them from the appropriate legal sanctions, prosecution and punishment within the US jurisdiction itself, isn’t clear: but we doubt it. Ironically, therefore, since the five Presidents have, by demanding immunity from prosecution from the World Court, acknowledged their own criminality, it is open to the US authorities to investigate, indict and arrest these operatives – since they have acknowledged their guilt. Where are you, Mr Holder?
Your job is to administer justice without fear or favour, isn’t it?
APPENDIX:
LORD MYNERS SAYS THERE MUST BE PENALTIES FOR BANK EXCESSES
On 8th March 2010, the UK ‘City Minister’ (Financial Services Secretary), Lord Myners, who in our opinion has been far too laid-back in failing to condemn criminality in the corrupted City of London, said that financial markets must ‘punish’ those who ‘make mistakes’ [sic!]. Without a ‘downside’, it would be impossible to ‘restore’ market discipline.
In all likelihood, Lord Myners didn’t really understand what he was saying – which was that the market system wasn’t functioning properly. And the reason for that is summarised in our report above: securitisation impedes the proper operation of market forces via its opposition to public policy in the bankruptcy context, its antitrust characteristics, and in the other ways described in outline in the present report. Does Myners understand this?
All that Lord Myners actually said, at a meeting in London, was that bankers had been obscenely remunerated even though they had ‘made serious mistakes’ (unspoken), code for ‘behaved like organized criminals’ (even more unspoken): ‘A lot of people lost money in the financial sector over the last few years – bank shareholders in particular suffered massive losses'.
'But many people have been protected. Creditors have been bailed out. Far too many bankers themselves have enjoyed massive awards during the crisis, even as their firms were rescued’.
Well, we knew all that. When he got down to detail, Myners told the meeting that the Government was determined to ensure that no bank was too complex to fail. ‘We’re serious about removing the safety net that has allowed those with blind faith in market efficiency to ignore the consequences of their lack of discipline’ [sic! Let the word ‘criminality’ NEVER BE MENTIONED].
‘We are also working with G-20 countries and the IMF to access the feasibility of an international levy or fee on financial institutions. This will make sure that any residual insurance that banks are perceived to enjoy after living wills are implemented, will not come for free’.
Lord Myners then redeemed his rather shallow observations by pointing out that the implicit support of the financial industry in the past had probably represented the most expensive public subsidy to any industry in any part of the British economy, 'vastly exceeding' that paid to agriculture or the defence industry.
‘There is no reason why the public, taxpayers, should continue to provide a free at the source of delivery subsidy to the cost of capital of the banking system. We need to do everything we can to shrink the subsidy to zero’.
Under the Brown Government’s new Financial Services Bill, consumers would be granted new powers to seek redress through the courts. However the weakness of Lord Myners’ presentation was his complete failure to indicate that he and the Government understand that a colossal volume of the transactions which gave rise to the crisis in the first place were and remain ILLEGAL.
It’s no use trying to reform the ‘framework’ when the transactions being promoted within the framework contravene antimonopoly legislation, bankruptcy legislation and all the other elements of the law identified in outline above. So, laudable though Lord Myners’ objectives appear to be, he is in fact wasting everyone’s time.
He appears not to understand that the transactions which precipitated the crisis were CRIMINAL TRANSACTIONS, and his failure to address the criminality issue – which is really the ONLY issue – indicates that the Government in London is trying to cover up and ignore the criminality: because of the vast tax accruals from the recalcitrant financial sector that the Government needs more than ever, given its colossal subsidies to the criminal financial enterprises whose casino operations have been exposed.
POSTSCRIPT:
STIGLITZ: 'THE AMERICAN BANKING SYSTEM IS CORRUPT'
The headline above appeared in the British press on 10th March 2010. Eager with anticipation and almost salivering with excitement, your correspondent rushed to read the article in question. Here, at last, he thought, was a fully paid-up member of the Great and the Good coming to his senses and calling a spade a spade at last. Alas, for Nobel Prize-winning Dr Stiglitz, a spade is in fact a fork.
Professor Stiglitz, who teaches at New York's Columbia University, said that the Federal Reserve System 'smells bad'. The Editor invoked the smell of the Fed, and of course agreed. But on further reading, it transpired that Dr Stiglitz was merely complaining that the Presidents of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks are chosen by commercial bankers.
'The regional Reserve Banks... have a key role in regulation and in the last crisis [i.e., once again, it's 'in the past': Ed.] of bailing out the banks. But the heads of these organisations are chosen by a committee dominated by the big banks that are being bailed out... so the people bailing out are appointed by the people who they bailed out. It smells bad. It looks bad. It undermines confidence'.
OH DEAR. Is this the best Dr Stiglitz can do? The American banking system is corrupt because the heads of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks are chosen by the big banks? Is that really, Dr S., the reason that the system is corrupt? Have we not been exposing rampant racketeering by the same big banks alluded to? Oh sorry, we forgot. He's a Nobel Prize-winning economist.
The holder of a Nobel Prize can only say what's considered kosher by the globalist internationalists who use the Nobel Prize system to 'EMBED' the 'PARTY LINE' in the public's psyche. So the 'party line', as we speak, is to ACKNOWLEDGE that, yes, the US banking system is indeed corrupt, as Mr Story has been reiterating as nauseam, but to attribute this to the way the heads of the regional Feds are chosen. [With the Federal Reserve Board, the number of Feds is a geomasonic 13].
Notes and references:
(1): As previously reported, the Editor visited the veteran author and journalist Gordon Thomas, at his suggestion, in Bath in the fourth quarter of 2004.
During that visit, Mr Thomas indicated that MI-6 had informed the British media that Christopher Story has been a participant in the abortive putsch in Equatorial Guinea, with which Mark Thatcher was associated. Since the Editor of this service has done nothing, literally, since 1963, except run his publishing and print production businesses, the Editor asked why such lies and false witness would be perpetrated – especially against someone such as the Editor of this service whose loyalty to the Crown and the United Kingdom cannot possibly be, and has never been, questioned.
He replied:
‘They think you may be dangerous because you control your own
publications and you have the documents’.
In divulging this, of course, Mr Thomas revealed that MI-6 itself had something to hide. If the Editor was dangerous ‘because you hold the documents’, the documents themselves clearly represented elements of something much bigger. So the consequence of this intervention was that the Editor naturally redoubled his private investigations to establish what MI-6 were so anxious to cover up.
When the Editor protested to Thomas that the lies disseminated to the media about him were rank fabrications, Gordon Thomas uttered the memorable response:
‘It doesn’t matter that it’s not true. What matters is that it’s out there’.
In the course of this meeting, Gordon Thomas made it quite clear to the Editor that he is an agent of influence and acts as an agent for MI-6. He said that his father had been an MI-6 officer.
Given Thomas’s statement ‘It doesn’t matter that it’s not true. What matters is that it’s out there’, everything that Gordon Thomas himself publishes must, by definition, be questioned – since he was quite content to go along with this twisted and nefarious mentality.
•You could say that by revealing this to the Editor, both Thomas and MI-6 exhibited a degree of abject stupidity which perhaps we haven’t emphasised sufficiently.
Furthermore, it became quite obvious that the purpose of this exercise was intimidation. Thomas accompanied his message with a veiled threat, as well. Clearly, these people are accustomed to targets caving in to such pressures, and they have no immediate backstop plans when the target fails to react in accordance with their evil intentions.
As a follow-up to this operation, Thomas badgered the Editor in New York to get in touch with an operative who later turned out to go by the nickname ‘The Visitor’, who used the name Walker as an alias, but who’s real (Ukrainian) name is Demchuk. This operative was said to have Pentagon links. At fist the Editor refused, but Gordon Thomas (as agent for MI-6) persisted, and finally the Editor agreed to meet this fellow, by appointment (arranged via Hushmail) in the fishing tackle area of a sports store on Fifth Avenue. The Editor has no interest in sport and had never been inside a sports store. However at the appointed hour, the Editor appeared, and found this man lurking in the traditional grey raincoat amid the fishing rods. We repaired to the Algonquin Hotel, where the operative proceeded to pump the Editor on one subject alone, namely Lt. Mark Delmart Vreeland.
Subsequently, Demchuk pestered the Editor to reveal all he knew about the Iraqi ‘Sarindar’ WMD removal programme, under which two Soviet ships had sailed from the Iraqi port of Umm Qasr in February 2002, ahead of the illegal invasion. The Editor had obtained information on this from open sources, especially the high-level Romanian defector, Ion Pacepa, and additionally from Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU), some information about which is available on the Internet.
In other words, the information supplied to this 'US' operative by the Editor was all obtained from open sources. The operative ordered a number of our publications which he said he would pay for, received them, but later vanished without fulfilling his financial undertaking (par for the course).
In March 2005, the Editor suddenly received a phone call from this Pentagon-linked operative in London, in which he spoke immediately about some operation in Monaco involving the dubious operative Bernie Ecclestone. The US operative appeared to assume that the Editor knew what he was talking about, as he gave the Editor to understand that he (Demchuk) believed that the Editor was involved with whatever operation in Monaco (a key CIA center) he was talking about. When the Editor said: ‘I have no idea what you are talking about. You’d better go back to your source’, there was a very long and stony silence.
He then said: ‘Well, that’s very surprising, in view of where this comes from’. Since the Editor knew from another source that Demchuk had just visited MI-6, it almost immediately became crystal clear that this was yet another attempt by MI-6 to ‘sting’ the Editor of this service.
In view of the fact that a US ‘inside’ source told a contact of the Editor’s in February 2010 that ‘MI-6 intend to take Story out’, because he knows too much about what is going on (and what they are up to), we place the foregoing information on the record again: and we will revisit these sequences with greater, hitherto unpublished, detail, in due course.
If the British intelligence community thinks it can intimidate a private publisher whose sole interest is to expose the racketeering that these people are all trying to cover up, it had better think again. You could argue that what we have done to date has actually assisted the British authorities to get their acts together in the face of this unprecedented crisis: but to be informed, after going through so much, that they intend to ‘take Story down’, is one slap in the face too many: and it reflects very badly on the US source of this disgraceful threat and further intimidation attempt, as well.
For the elimination of all residual doubt, we will persist with these exposures until such time as the necessary remedial measures have been taken. Interestingly, as you will have noted appended to this report (Appendix), Lord Myners, the City (of London) Minister in the Labour Government, has just indicated that the measures taken to discipline the City have been quite inadequate to date – although he fails to use words like ‘criminal’, ‘fraud’, ‘organised crime’, ‘racketeering’, ‘Fraudulent Finance’ etc: so he has a great deal of catching up (with us) to do.
(2): See the following reports on this website [Archive]:
•9th January 2010: Text of the CMKM/CMKX lawsuit against the S.E.C.: Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx): Santa Ana, California. Subsequent to our posting the complete text of the Complaint immediately it had been filed, the text was also made available on the following link:http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/paKdda
•29th January 2010: Service of CMKM/CMKX $3.87 trillion suit vs. S.E.C.
•07 February 2010: Legal moves to sue those blocking the Settlements
•02 March 2010: S.E.C. Phantom Shares Fraud: New Intelligence
(3): See text of the letter from Mr A. Clifton Hodges, Attorney for the CMKM/CMKX victims, to the Office of the Attorney General for New York State, Mr Andrew Cuomo: report of 2nd March 2010.
(4): Wanta’s rôle, having served as courier between Bush Sr. and Gorbachëv, has always been to facilitate thefts and diversions of funds to George Bush Sr. (and Gorbachëv, given that the former Communist President is a partner with Bush Sr. in Deutsche AG., as explained in this and recent reports). This helps to explain why from time to time during these investigations, we have been told that ‘Bush Sr. considers the monies to belong to him’.
(5) A ‘Foreclosure Autopsy’ reporting service is available, for instance, from the following analyst:
Charles Wayne Cox
Certified Forensic Loan Analyst
Notary Public
131 Sutphen Street
Santa Cruz
California 95060
Telephone: 831-466 3440
Facsimile: 619-330 2379
Email: mailto:Charles@BayLiving.com
Website: www.ForensicLoanAnalyst.com
Charles Cox is recommended to the Editor personally by a friend of impeccable integrity who is also an expert on these issues, based in San Diego. Cox is a Para-Legal and a noted forensic expert on reading mortgage documents, serving lawyers to help their foreclosure clients. Our friend and correspondent wrote, when introducing Charles Cox: ‘Charles helped a friend of mine here in San Diego by reading his original Note and mortgage documents. Incredibly, the Note to the mortgage was made out to San Diego. Later, a copy from the County Recorder’s office showed that San Diego had been crossed out, and written in was ‘United Republic’.
The mortgage was done by a mortgage company in Colorado (now out of business) but was sold to Aurora which was owned by Lehman Brothers. Aurora is still the servicer on the loan, and my friend is suing them and requested through a qualified letter a copy of the original Note to show that they are the legal owners of the Note’.
(6): ‘Northern Rock’s Line in Excuses: Holding Paid-out Title Deeds for Five Years: A forensic analysis of how Northern Rock managed to hold on to title deeds belonging to a former mortgagor, with details of its conflicting excuses for non-performance’: International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York, Numbers 1 and 2, pages F-153 to F-172.
(7) ‘Securitization is completely illegal and fraudulent under US law’, Economic Intelligence Review,World Reports Limited, London and New York, pages 5-21.
(8): ‘Gensler Turns Back on Wall Street to Push Derivatives Overhaul’,
Bloomberg, 12th February 2010.
(9): ‘Gensler Turns Back on Wall Street to Push Derivatives Overhaul’,
Bloomberg, op. cit., 12th February 2010.
(10) ‘January 2010 News and Information for DTCC customers’ published
by the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation’, accessed 13th February 2010.
(11): The derivatives data maintained by the Bank for International Settlements, and reproduced by the International Monetary Fund in successive issues of its literature, are the only ‘reliable’ data available. Because they are issued by the BIS, they are authoritative, but it is not known whether they are accurate. The BIS data, which exclude double counting, showed that in June 2008, total Notional Over-the-Counter derivatives contracts outstanding on that basis reached some $693,814 billion. By December 2008, this total had contracted to $547,371 billion given the discontinuity of September 2008; but by June 2008, the total outstanding had recovered to $604,622 billion.
The Gross Market value of total underlying derivatives contracts outstanding amounted to $20.4 trillion in June 2008. $32.2 trillion in December 2008, and $25.4 trillion in June 2009.
(12): ‘January 2010 News and Information for DTCC customers’ published
by the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation’, op. cit., accessed 13th February 2010.
LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:
LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:
Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Hauppauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.
Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:
•“ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.
•“THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.
Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:
THEFT BY DECEPTION:
•“FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.
•“The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.
•To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.
Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., 'Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.
FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:
•“FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.
•“Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.
Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary', Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.
U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:
•NASD Rule 3120, et al.
•NASD Rule 2330, et al
•NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
•NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
•NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
•NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
•SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
•NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
•NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
•NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
•NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
•97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.
U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:
•Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
•Anti-Drug Abuse Act
•Applicable international money laundering restrictions
•Bank Secrecy Act
•Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
•Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
•Economic Espionage Act
•Hobbs Act
•Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
•Maloney Act
•Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
•Money-Laundering Control Act
•Money-Laundering Suppression Act
•Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
•Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
•Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
•Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
•Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
•Securities Act 1933
•Securities Act 1934
•Terrorism Prevention Act
•Treason legislation, especially in time of war.
source: worldreports.org
2 comments:
I just added your blog site to my blogroll, I pray you would give some thought to doing the same.
Just popping in to say nice site.
Post a Comment